Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trialopen access

Authors
Park, Jae HyeonPark, Jae YoonLee, Geum SilCha, Ran-hui
Issue Date
Mar-2025
Publisher
대한신장학회
Keywords
Dietary proteins; Dietary supplementation; Electric stimulation; Hemodialysis; Muscle strength; Protein
Citation
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, v.44, no.2, pp 1 - 12
Pages
12
Indexed
SCIE
DOMESTIC
Journal Title
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
Volume
44
Number
2
Start Page
1
End Page
12
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/196559
DOI
10.23876/j.krcp.23.146
ISSN
2211-9132
2211-9140
Abstract
Background Sarcopenia is common in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in hemodialysis patients. Methods We performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to the control group, the protein group (25 g of protein at every dialysis session), the NMES group (intradialytic NMES to quadriceps femoris muscles), and the NMES + P group (NMES with protein supplementation). The primary outcome was the difference in hand grip strength (HGS) and leg muscle strength (LMS) among groups. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance (the 10-m walk test and the timed up and go test [TUG]), and questionnaires about quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and depression. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed by dividing NMES and NMES + P groups into high- and low-intensity NMES groups. Results Fifty-nine patients completed all the study outcomes. There was no difference in muscle strength (HGS and LMS) and muscle mass among groups. Gait speed improved in NMES and NMES + P groups. Subscale scores for QoL (kidney disease effect, role limitations due to physical or emotional problems, and overall health ratings) improved in the NMES + P group. In subgroup analysis, LMS and TUG improved only in the high-intensity NMES group. Conclusion In this study, NMES and-/or- protein supplementation did not make a significant difference in HGS and LMS. However, NMES or NMES + P improved functional capacity and QoL. Furthermore, higher NMES was superior in improving LMS and functional capacity.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 재활의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Jae Hyeon photo

Park, Jae Hyeon
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE