Efficacy of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trialopen access
- Authors
- Park, Jae Hyeon; Park, Jae Yoon; Lee, Geum Sil; Cha, Ran-hui
- Issue Date
- Mar-2025
- Publisher
- 대한신장학회
- Keywords
- Dietary proteins; Dietary supplementation; Electric stimulation; Hemodialysis; Muscle strength; Protein
- Citation
- Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, v.44, no.2, pp 1 - 12
- Pages
- 12
- Indexed
- SCIE
DOMESTIC
- Journal Title
- Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
- Volume
- 44
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 12
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/196559
- DOI
- 10.23876/j.krcp.23.146
- ISSN
- 2211-9132
2211-9140
- Abstract
- Background
Sarcopenia is common in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in hemodialysis patients.
Methods
We performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to the control group, the protein group (25 g of protein at every dialysis session), the NMES group (intradialytic NMES to quadriceps femoris muscles), and the NMES + P group (NMES with protein supplementation). The primary outcome was the difference in hand grip strength (HGS) and leg muscle strength (LMS) among groups. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance (the 10-m walk test and the timed up and go test [TUG]), and questionnaires about quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and depression. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed by dividing NMES and NMES + P groups into high- and low-intensity NMES groups.
Results
Fifty-nine patients completed all the study outcomes. There was no difference in muscle strength (HGS and LMS) and muscle mass among groups. Gait speed improved in NMES and NMES + P groups. Subscale scores for QoL (kidney disease effect, role limitations due to physical or emotional problems, and overall health ratings) improved in the NMES + P group. In subgroup analysis, LMS and TUG improved only in the high-intensity NMES group.
Conclusion
In this study, NMES and-/or- protein supplementation did not make a significant difference in HGS and LMS. However, NMES or NMES + P improved functional capacity and QoL. Furthermore, higher NMES was superior in improving LMS and functional capacity.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 재활의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.