Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

국·공유지를 점유한 무허가 정착지의 이주대책 중요 요인에 대한 전문가와 주민 간 비교 분석 - 서초구 3개 마을 사례를 중심으로 -Comparative Analysis between Experts and Residents on the Important Factors of Relocation Strategies for Informal Settlements Occupying Public Lands : Focusing on the cases of three villages in Seocho District

Other Titles
Comparative Analysis between Experts and Residents on the Important Factors of Relocation Strategies for Informal Settlements Occupying Public Lands : Focusing on the cases of three villages in Seocho District
Authors
정재원구자훈
Issue Date
Mar-2024
Publisher
한국주거환경학회
Keywords
Public lands; Informal settlements; Relocation strategies; Delphi technique; AHP Analysis; 국·공유지; 무허가 정착지; 이주대책; 델파이기법; AHP분석
Citation
주거환경, v.22, no.1, pp 159 - 170
Pages
12
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
주거환경
Volume
22
Number
1
Start Page
159
End Page
170
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/196945
DOI
10.22313/reik.2024.22.1.159
ISSN
1738-0316
2508-3961
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the important factors of relocation strategies for informal settlements occupying national and communal lands. Using the Delphi technique and AHP analysis model, this study derived the importance and priority of 3 major factors and 12 sub-factors, and the results of comparative analysis between experts and residents are as follows. First, in the case of major factors, the priority of experts appeared in the order of institutional factors, economic factors, and project implementation factors, and the priority of residents was derived in the order of economic factors, institutional factors, and project implementation factors. Second, among the sub-factors of economic factors, experts showed that the payment of compensation is the most important factor, and residents derived the factor of compensation and arrears resolution as the most important. In the case of institutional factors, both experts and residents selected the factor of legislation and system establishment as the most important factor, but experts selected the installation of a dedicated department as the second priority, and residents judged the legal representative system as the second priority. In the case of project implementation factors, both experts and residents judged the transparent project factor as the most important factor. This study compared and analyzed the important factors of relocation strategies not only for experts but also for actual residents of informal settlements, and it can be seen that this provided effective policy implications for reducing gaps between subjects when establishing relocation strategies.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 도시대학원 > 서울 도시·지역개발경영학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE