Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balanceopen access

Authors
Krishna, V. S. Raghav HariKim, JeongheeChang, Shuo-HsiuChoe, YoonsuckPark, Hangue
Issue Date
Mar-2024
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Keywords
standing balance; neuromodulation; electrotactile feedback; electrical stimulation; calcaneal nerve stimulation
Citation
Frontiers in Neuroscience, v.18, pp 1 - 12
Pages
12
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Volume
18
Start Page
1
End Page
12
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/196954
DOI
10.3389/fnins.2024.1249783
ISSN
1662-4548
1662-453X
Abstract
Introduction: Plantar cutaneous augmentation is a promising approach in balance rehabilitation by enhancing motion-dependent sensory feedback. The effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance has been mainly investigated in its passive form (e.g., textured insole) or on lower-limb amputees. In this study, we tested the effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance in its active form (i.e., electrical stimulation) for individuals with intact limbs. Methods: Ten healthy subjects participated in the study and were instructed to maintain their balance as long as possible on the balance board, with or without electrotactile feedback evoked on the medial side of the heel, synched with the lateral board sway. Electrotactile feedback was given in two different modes: 1) Discrete-mode E-stim as the stimulation on/off by a predefined threshold of lateral board sway and 2) Proportional-mode E-stim as the stimulation frequency proportional to the amount of lateral board sway. All subjects were distracted from the balancing task by the n-back counting task, to test subjects' balancing capability with minimal cognitive involvement. Results: Proportional-mode E-stim, along with the n-back counting task, increased the balance time from 1.86 +/- 0.03 s to 1.98 +/- 0.04 s (p = 0.010). However, discrete-mode E-stim did not change the balance time (p = 0.669). Proportional-mode E-stim also increased the time duration per each swayed state (p = 0.035) while discrete-mode E-stim did not (p = 0.053). Discussion: These results suggest that proportional-mode E-stim is more effective than discrete-mode E-stim on improving standing balance. It is perhaps because the proportional electrotactile feedback better mimics the natural tactile sensation of foot pressure than its discrete counterpart.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 융합전자공학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jeonghee photo

Kim, Jeonghee
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (SCHOOL OF ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE