2011년 형법 중요 판례

Abstract

이 글에서는 2011. 1. 1.부터 2011. 12. 31.까지 선고된 대법원 형법 판결 중 4건의 전원합의체판결을 평석하였다. 대법원 2011. 1. 20. 선고 2008도10479 판결은 동산의 이중매매에 대한 판결이다. 대법원 2011. 3. 17.선고 2006도8839 판결은 불법감청한 내용을 공개한 방송기자의 죄책에 관한 것이다. 대법원 2011. 3.17. 선고 2007도482 판결은 파업이 업무방해죄의 위력에 해당되는가에 대한 것이다. 대법원 2011. 6.23. 선고 2008도7562 판결은 헌법불합치결정을 받은 형벌법규가 개정되지 않은 경우 소급효에 관한 것이다. 각 평석은 모두 1. 사실관계 및 재판의 경과, 2. 판결요지, 3. 평석의 순으로 이루어졌다.

In the year of 2011, 232 criminal cases by the Korean Supreme Court(KSC) are registered on the homepage of the court. 5 cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel. 4 cases of which are reviewed in this paper. All the reviews are constituted 1. Fact, 2. Summary of Decision and 3. Critical Note. The contents of this paper is as follows; I. Introduction

II. The Grand Panel of KSC’s Judgement 2011. 1. 20.2008Do10479. In this case, the criminal resposibility of the double selling of the movable assets is disputed. On the contrary to the double selling of the unmovable assests, the court decided that the accused is not guilty of Untreu(the breach of duty).

III. The Grand Panel of KSC’s Judgement 2011. 3. 17 2006DO8839 In this case, the criminal responsibility of the jouralist’s exposure of the illegally obtained recording by the Korean CIA is disputed. The court decided that the act of accused is illegal.

IV. The Grand Panel of KSC’s Judgement 2011. 3. 17 2007DO482 In this case, the criminal responsibility of the strike is disputed. KSC has changed it’s former position and decided that the strike in the limited situation could be guilty.

V. The Grand Panel of KSC’s Judgement 2011. 6. 23 2008DO7562In this case, the validity of the criminal provision is debated, which the Korean Constuitutional Court has decided not in accord with the constitutional law, even if, not unconstitutional. KSC decided that the criminal provision is retroactively unvalid.