Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Diseaseopen access

Authors
Han, Hyun JeongPark, Mee YoungPark, Kyung WonPark, Kee HyungChoi, Seong HyeKim, Hee-JinYang, Dong WonEbenezer, Esther Gunaseli A. P. M.Yang, Yuan-HanKewalram, Gurudev M.Han, Seol-Heui
Issue Date
Jul-2022
Publisher
KOREAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOC
Keywords
donepezil transdermal patch; Alzheimer's disease; efficacy; safety; acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, v.18, no.4, pp 428 - 436
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume
18
Number
4
Start Page
428
End Page
436
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/203194
DOI
10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.428
ISSN
1738-6586
2005-5013
Abstract
Background and Purpose Oral administration of cholinesterase inhibitors is often associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects, and so developing an alternative administration route, such as transdermal, is urgently needed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the IPI-301 donepezil transdermal patch compared with donepezil tablets (control) in mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-arm parallel, multicenter trial included 399 patients, among whom 303 completed the trial. For randomization, the patients were stratified based on previous treatment and donepezil dose; patients in each stratum were randomized to the test and control groups at a 1:1 ratio. Results The difference between the control group and the IPI-301 group, quantified as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift, was 0.00 (95% confidence interval: -1.00 to 1.33), with an upper limit of less than 2.02. The change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative StudyActivities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score differed significantly between the IPI-301 and control groups (p=0.02). However, the changes in the full-itemized ADCS-ADL scores at week 24 did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the scores for the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (p=0.9097), Mini-Mental State Examination (p=0.7018), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (p=0.7656), or Clinical Dementia Rating (p=0.9990). Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory test results were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions IPI-301 was safe and efficacious in improving cognitive function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 신경과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hee-Jin photo

Kim, Hee-Jin
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE