오픈마켓 서비스와 상표권 침해Open Market Service and Trademark Infringement
- Other Titles
- Open Market Service and Trademark Infringement
- Authors
- 김병일
- Issue Date
- Dec-2010
- Publisher
- 한국지식재산학회
- Keywords
- Open Market; Counterfeit; Trademark Infringement; e-commerce; 오픈마켓; 위조상품; 상표권 침해; 전자상거래
- Citation
- 산업재산권, no.33, pp 81 - 110
- Pages
- 30
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 산업재산권
- Number
- 33
- Start Page
- 81
- End Page
- 110
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/203283
- ISSN
- 1598-6055
2733-9483
- Abstract
- Liability for contributory trademark infringement may be imposed where a manufacturer or distributor (1) intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark or (2) continues to supply a product to someone who it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement. The test for contributory infringement focuses on manufacturers, distributors of products.
There has however been an open question about whether or at least to what extent the contributory infringement doctrine even applied to services.
Recently, cosmetics firm L'Oréal has failed in its bid to hold eBay responsible for the sale of counterfeit goods in France. A French court said that the online auction site had done all that it had to to stop counterfeit sales.
Open market such as eBay, G-Market is an electronic marketplace, not a retailer, and never takes physical possession of goods sold through its website. eBay may be not liable for contributory infringement because it does not have sufficient knowledge of specific acts of infringement on its site and,when it does, it must act appropriately to discontinue the listing.
This article has focused on four important constellations of liability - liability for open market service provider such as eBay, G-Market.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 법학전문대학원 > 서울 법학전문대학원 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.