Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Artificial Intelligence-Based Fully Automated Quantitative Coronary Angiography vs Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided PCI

Authors
Kim, YongcheolYoon, Hyuck-JunSuh, JonKang, Si-HyuckLim, Young-HyoJang, Duck HyunPark, Jae HyoungShin, Eun-SeokPark, HanbitAhn, Jung-MinBae, Jang-WhanLee, Jang HoonOh, Jun-HyokKang, Do-YoonKweon, JihoonJo, Min-WooYun, Sung-CheolPark, Duk-WooKim, Young-HakPark, Seung-Jung
Issue Date
Jan-2025
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Keywords
artificial intelligence; coronary imaging; coronary intervention; quantitative coronary angiography; stent(s)
Citation
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.18, no.2, pp 187 - 197
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
18
Number
2
Start Page
187
End Page
197
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/206769
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.025
ISSN
1936-8798
1876-7605
Abstract
Background: Recently developed artificial intelligence-based coronary angiography (AI-QCA, fully automated) provides real-time, objective, and reproducible quantitative analysis of coronary angiography without requiring additional time or labor. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AI-QCA-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI in terms of post-PCI results. Methods: This trial enrolled 400 patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing PCI from 13 participating centers in South Korea. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either AI-QCA-assisted or OCT-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was the post-PCI minimal stent area (MSA) assessed by OCT. The noninferiority of AI-QCA-assisted PCI to OCT-guided PCI regarding the post-PCI MSA was tested with a noninferiority margin of 0.8 mm(2). Results: </bold>A total of 395 patients (199 in the AI-QCA group and 196 in the OCT group) were included in the primary endpoint analysis. The post-PCI MSA was 6.3 +/- 2.2 mm(2) in the AI-QCA group and 6.2 +/- 2.2 mm(2) in the OCT group (difference, -0.16; 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.28; P for noninferiority < 0.001). Other OCT-defined endpoints, such as stent underexpansion (50.8% [101/199] vs 54.6% [107/196]; P = 0.48), dissection (15.6% [31/199] vs 12.8% [25/196]; P = 0.42), and untreated reference segment disease (15.1% [30/199] vs 13.3% [26/196]; P = 0.61), were not significantly different between groups, except for a higher incidence of stent malapposition in the AI-QCA group (13.6% [27/199] vs 5.6 [11/196]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the noninferiority of AI-QCA-assisted PCI to OCT-guided PCI in achieving MSA with comparable OCT-defined endpoints. (Fully Automated Quantitative Coronary Angiography Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance for Coronary Stent Implantation [FLASH]; NCT05388357).
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lim, Young-Hyo photo

Lim, Young-Hyo
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE