Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiogram to rule out acute myocardial infarction: the ROMIAE multicentre study
- Authors
- Lee, Min Sung; Shin, Tae Gun; Lee, Youngjoo; Kim, Dong Hoon; Choi, Sung Hyuk; Cho, Hanjin; Lee, Mi Jin; Lim, Tae Ho; Kwon, Joon-myoung; Kim, Kyuseok; Jeong, Ki Young; Kim, Won Young; Min, Young Gi; Han, Chul; Yoon, Jae Chol; Jung, Eujene; Kim, Woo Jeong; Ahn, Chiwon; Seo, Jeong Yeol; Kim, Jae Seong; Choi, Jeff; ROMIAE Study Grp, Jong Eun
- Issue Date
- May-2025
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction; Artificial intelligence; Electrocardiogram; Emergency department; Acute coronary syndrome; AI/ML-enabled SaMD
- Citation
- European Heart Journal, v.46, no.20, pp 1917 - 1929
- Pages
- 13
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- European Heart Journal
- Volume
- 46
- Number
- 20
- Start Page
- 1917
- End Page
- 1929
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/207921
- DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf004
- ISSN
- 0195-668X
1522-9645
- Abstract
- Background and Aims: Emerging evidence supports artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) for detecting acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but real-world validation is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of AI-ECG in detecting AMI in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: The Rule-Out acute Myocardial Infarction using Artificial intelligence Electrocardiogram analysis (ROMIAE) study is a prospective cohort study conducted in the Republic of Korea from March 2022 to October 2023, involving 18 university-level teaching hospitals. Adult patients presenting to the ED within 24 h of symptom onset concerning for AMI were assessed. Exposure included AI-ECG score, HEART score, GRACE 2.0 score, high-sensitivity troponin level, and Physician AMI score. The primary outcome was diagnosis of AMI during index admission, and the secondary outcome was 30 day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).
Results: The study population comprised 8493 adults, of whom 1586 (18.6%) were diagnosed with AMI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AI-ECG was 0.878 (95% CI, 0.868-0.888), comparable with the HEART score (0.877; 95% CI, 0.869-0.886) and superior to the GRACE 2.0 score, high-sensitivity troponin level, and Physician AMI score. For predicting 30 day MACE, AI-ECG (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.866; 95% CI, 0.856-0.877) performed comparably with the HEART score (0.858; 95% CI, 0.848-0.868). The integration of the AI-ECG improved risk stratification and AMI discrimination, with a net reclassification improvement of 19.6% (95% CI, 17.38-21.89) and a C-index of 0.926 (95% CI, 0.919-0.933), compared with the HEART score alone.
Conclusions: In this multicentre prospective study, the AI-ECG demonstrated diagnostic accuracy and predictive power for AMI and 30 day MACE, which was similar to or better than that of traditional risk stratification methods and ED physicians.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 응급의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.