Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patientsopen accessA Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patients

Other Titles
A Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patients
Authors
김기연송선영정유진주민숙홍지연김범준고주연
Issue Date
Oct-2024
Publisher
대한피부과학회
Keywords
Acne; Intense pulsed light therapy; Microneedling; Radiofrequency therapy
Citation
Annals of Dermatology, v.36, no.5, pp 266 - 274
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Annals of Dermatology
Volume
36
Number
5
Start Page
266
End Page
274
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/211057
DOI
10.5021/ad.23.083
ISSN
1013-9087
2005-3894
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) and intense pulsed light (IPL) have been reported as efficient adjuvant treatment modalities for acne vulgaris. Objective: We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combined needle RF and vacuum IPL device for acne treatment without the use of other conventional topical or oral agents. Methods: This randomized, split-faced study was designed to include patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Comedone extraction was performed on both parts of the face prior to laser treatment. One side of the face was treated with RF and IPL in 2-week inter vals, while the other side was left untreated as a control. Two independent blinded investigators evalu- ated the patients for improvement using clinical photographs. We also assessed for possible adverse effects. Results: The study included 44 patients with acne vulgaris (27 men and 17 women). Their ages ranged from 19–39 years (average, 23 years). At the final 12-week follow-up visit, the acne reduction rate was 34.80% (±33.45%; range, 30.92%–19.03%) on the treated side and 13.76% (±37.58%; range, 28.26%–23.27%) in the control group compared to baseline, constituting a significant difference. The difference in reduction rate between the treated and control sides was 21.03% (±25.09%), with the treated side experiencing more significant improvement (p<0.05). In the assessment of adverse events, one patient experienced mild surrounding er ythema that spontaneously improved. Conclusion: Combined treatment of needle RF and IPL could improve acne lesions.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 피부과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Ko, Joo Yeon photo

Ko, Joo Yeon
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF DERMATOLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE