Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Reviewing the socio-technical dynamics of AI, data centers and digitalization on energy and the environmentopen access

Authors
Kim, JinsooKim, JihyoSovacool, Benjamin K.Griffiths, SteveBazilian, MorganCreutzig, FelixFurszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D.Agrawala, MatthewChoi, MinkiDebnath, Ramit
Issue Date
Jul-2026
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
Data center; Digitalization; Energy and environment; Low-carbon innovations; Socio-technical dynamics; | artificial intelligence
Citation
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v.234, pp 1 - 24
Pages
24
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume
234
Start Page
1
End Page
24
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/211824
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2026.116861
ISSN
1364-0321
1879-0690
Abstract
|The recent and rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), data centers, and other digitalization technologies has accelerated global electricity consumption, creating a new paradigm in energy and growth. Still, no comprehensive framework exists to evaluate the role of low-carbon innovations across AI's complex sociotechnical ecosystem. This review addresses three questions: What low- and zero-carbon technologies can help mitigate the energy and carbon footprint of AI and digitalization? What barriers prevent their adoption? Which policy interventions can overcome these barriers? Using a sociotechnical systems approach, we conducted a systematic literature search and screened 364 articles published from 2000 to 2025 to analyze impacts and opportunities across four critical dimensions of AI, data centers, and digitalization provisioning: natural resources, facilities and components, applications, and users and institutions. We identify over 70 mitigation technologies, with reported energy reductions ranging from 13% to 94% across individual studies, alongside projections in high-growth scenarios where data center electricity demand could grow by 13–15% per year to 2030. Three barrier categories emerged: technological constraints, institutional and political limitations, and behavioral resistance. Policy measures such as carbon pricing and mandatory energy reporting, and operational strategies, such as geographic load balancing, are frequently highlighted as high-leverage options for overcoming these barriers. This holistic STS framework provides a foundation for future interdisciplinary research and policy development, identifying critical research gaps including demand forecasting, Global South equity, and organizational change.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 자원환경공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jinsoo photo

Kim, Jinsoo
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (DEPARTMENT OF EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE