Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The infuence of scafolding for computational thinking on cognitive load and problemsolving skills in collaborative programming (oct, DOI 10.1007/s10639-024-13104-0, 2024)Correction to: The infuence of scafolding for computational thinking on cognitive load and problemsolving skills in collaborative programming

Other Titles
Correction to: The infuence of scafolding for computational thinking on cognitive load and problemsolving skills in collaborative programming
Authors
Shin, YoonheeJung, JaewonChoi, SeohyunJung, Bokmoon
Issue Date
Apr-2025
Publisher
Springer
Citation
Education and Information Technologies, v.30, no.6, pp 8351 - 8352
Pages
2
Indexed
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Education and Information Technologies
Volume
30
Number
6
Start Page
8351
End Page
8352
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/212458
DOI
10.1007/s10639-024-13131-x
ISSN
1360-2357
1573-7608
Abstract
The first author of this article, Yoonhee Shin, has requested the following corrections: Table 2 Correction: The table published in the article contains errors and has been edited incorrectly. The first author requests to replace Table 2 in both the PDF and web versions with the correct table being submitted to improve the readers’ understanding of the paper’s core content. Please change to table 2 below. Funding Information Addition: The first author also requests to include the following funding information that was previously omitted. Affilition of author Bokmoon Jung will be changed from: Original Version:Korea National University of Education, 241-20, Hanguktongsin-Ro, Gwangui-Myeon, Gurye-Gun, Jeollanam-Do, South Korea Revised Version:Korea National University of Education, 250 Taeseongtabyeon-ro, Gangnae-myeon, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungbuk 28173, South Korea “The research was supported by a research grant from Hanyang University (HY-202100000003040), led by the first author”. Metacognitive scaffolding Metacognitive Factor Guidance Questions Group FW CF FCM CFCM Planning Basic (1) What are the relevant elements of the problem that need to be addressed? (2) Is the new information presented in the question different from the information understood? O O O O For CT (3) Break down the problem you need to solve into smaller chunks. (4) How do you think computational thinking was used to solve the questions above? (Abstraction, Decomposition, Algorithm, Automation, Debugging, etc.) O O Monitoring Basic (1) Has the detailed goal setting for problem-solving been completed? (2) Has your code been sufficiently tested? O O O O For CT (3) Has a good understanding of computational concepts in problems and solutions? (e.g., am I confused? Is my understanding of those failure accurate? ) (4) How do you think computational thinking was used to solve the questions above? (Abstraction, Decomposition, Algorithm, Automation, Debugging etc.) O O Reflection Basic (1) Did you encounter any challenges in problem-solving? Please elaborate on the nature of these difficulties. (2) Are there any alternative solutions to the problem beyond the one presented in the example? Please compose the code for such a solution and append the execution screen. O O O O © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 사범대학 > 서울 교육공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher ,  photo

,
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE