Experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making in South Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of the general publicopen access
- Authors
- Kim, Min Ji; Yoo, Sang Ho
- Issue Date
- May-2026
- Publisher
- BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
- Keywords
- Clinical Decision-Making; Patient Participation; Patient-Centered Care; Surveys and Questionnaires
- Citation
- BMJ OPEN, v.16, no.5, pp 1 - 9
- Pages
- 9
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- BMJ OPEN
- Volume
- 16
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 9
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/212879
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116163
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
2044-6055
- Abstract
- Objectives Active patient involvement is a core principle of patient-centred care, yet public experiences of medical decision-making in non-Western settings remain underexamined. In South Korea, nationwide evidence on how adults experience, perceive and prefer medical decision-making is limited. This study, therefore, examined Korean adults' experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and April 2025 using online data collection for adults aged 19-59 years and face-to-face interviews for those aged 60 years or older. Setting This nationwide survey was conducted in South Korea. Participants A total of 1081 Korean adults were recruited using proportional quotas for sex, age group and region. After excluding withdrawals and invalid responses, 1000 were included (response rate 92.5%). Results Overall, 70.4% of respondents reported at least one significant health-related decision in the past 2 years. Although 34.1% reported making their most recent decision independently, a larger proportion preferred collaborative decision-making involving clinicians and/ or family members. The clinician's explanation was the most influential factor (77.4%). Preferences for primary decision-maker varied by clinical context: patient-led decisions were favoured for low-risk interventions such as vaccination (78.5%), whereas physician involvement was preferred for life-threatening illness (86.2%). Communication ratings were highest for presentation of treatment options (mean score 3.56 +/- 0.79 on a 5-point scale) and lowest for explanation of potential treatment risks (mean score 3.20 +/- 0.89). Participants satisfied with decision outcomes reported higher communication quality (p<0.001), while those reporting neutral satisfaction (37.1%) resembled dissatisfied participants (4.1%). Conclusions Medical decision-making was common, but respondents' experiences did not always match their preference for collaborative involvement. The findings suggest that strengthening patient-centred care in South Korea will require not only improvements in patient-clinician communication, but also attention to family involvement and structural conditions such as limited consultation time and current reimbursement arrangements.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 의료인문학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.