Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Indapamide Combination Therapy versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients with Essential Hypertension Inadequately Responding to Fimasartan 30 mg (FINEDUO): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Studyopen access

Authors
Youn, Jong-ChanLee, So-YoungYu, Cheol WoongSung, Ki-ChulShin, JinhoOh, Ju HyeonNa, Jin OhKim, Dae-HeeCho, Eun JooYoon, Hyuck-JunLee, Chan JooLee, Han CheolLee, Hae-YoungSohn, Il SukLee, Kyu-SunKim, Doo IlChoi, Woong GilChung, Wook-JinLee, Eun MiChoi, Seung-HyukChoi, SeonghoonKang, Tae SooIhm, Sang-Hyun
Issue Date
Apr-2026
Publisher
DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
Keywords
blood pressure control; combination therapy; fimasartan; indapamide sustained release; hypertension
Citation
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, v.20, pp 1 - 17
Pages
17
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
Volume
20
Start Page
1
End Page
17
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/212906
DOI
10.2147/DDDT.S578736
ISSN
1177-8881
Abstract
Purpose: Effective blood pressure (BP) control in hypertension frequently requires combination therapy, particularly in patients whose BP is inadequately controlled by monotherapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fimasartan (FMS) and indapamide (IND) sustained release (SR) combination therapy. Patients and Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with hypertension who remained uncontrolled after a 4-week run-in with FMS 30 mg, were randomized to FMS 30 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 30 mg, followed by forced titration to FMS 60 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 60 mg after 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in sitting systolic BP (SiSBP) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in sitting diastolic BP (SiDBP), BP control rates, response rates, and safety outcomes. Results: Two hundred forty-eight patients were randomized (FMS/IND SR, n=126; FMS, n=122). At week 8, the least square mean reduction in SiSBP was greater with FMS/IND SR than with FMS (−17.9 vs −7.4 mmHg, P<0.0001). Significant improvements were also observed for SiSBP at week 4, SiDBP at week 4 and 8, and BP control rates and response rates. The safety profile was comparable between groups, with no significant differences in adverse events, including patients aged 65 years and older. Conclusion: FMS/IND SR combination therapy demonstrated superior antihypertensive efficacy, rapid BP control, and comparable safety to FMS monotherapy. This regimen may serve as an effective therapeutic option, particularly in elderly or high-risk hypertensive patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05878561.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shin, Jinho photo

Shin, Jinho
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE