Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Development of the Rapid Cough Questionnaire: Key item identificationopen access

Authors
Koo, Hyeon-KyoungMoon, Ji-YongKim, Jin WooJang, Seung HunKwon, Jae-WooLee, Byung-JaePark, Yong BumKim, Deog Kyeom
Issue Date
Apr-2024
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citation
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, v.132, no.4, pp 491 - 496
Pages
6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume
132
Number
4
Start Page
491
End Page
496
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/213091
DOI
10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.025
ISSN
1081-1206
1534-4436
Abstract
Background: The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a reliable tool for measuring the multidimensional impact of cough on patients’ quality of life; however, its scoring algorithm is lengthy and complex for routine clinical use. Objective: The study aimed to develop a simplified version of the LCQ, the Rapid Cough Questionnaire (RCQ), as a substitue in clinical practice and validate the RCQ using an independent cohort. Methods: To select items for the RCQ score, a correlation network was used to determine the items from each domain that were strongly correlated with the total LCQ score. The final items for the RCQ were selected on the basis of the centrality of the node degree, betweenness, and closeness in the correlation network. Results: The RCQ score was derived from 3 items: tiredness (LCQ3) in the physical domain, the feeling of being fed up (LCQ13) in the psychological domain, and annoyance with partner/family/friends (LCQ19) in the social domain. The correlation between the LCQ and RCQ was high, with a coefficient of 0.93 (P < .001). The mean score of the RCQ was 11.2 ± 3.2, with scores ranging from 5.15 to 19.55. The minimal clinically important difference in the RCQ score was calculated to be 1.6 using a distribution-based method. The concurrent validity of the LCQ and the RCQ with cough numeric rating scale was similar. In the validation cohort, the correlation between the LCQ and RCQ scores was consistent regardless of sex and etiology. Conclusion: The RCQ score, which is concise, reliable, and valid, can be a valuable tool for patient assessment, particularly in clinical practice.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE