Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 20 mg/S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg versus Telmisartan 40 mg in Patients with Hypertension, Inadequately Controlled on Telmisartan 20 mg Monotherapy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trialopen accessEfficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 20 mg/ S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg versus Telmisartan 40 mg in Patients with Hypertension, Inadequately Controlled on Telmisartan 20 mg Monotherapy: A Randomized Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial

Other Titles
Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 20 mg/ S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg versus Telmisartan 40 mg in Patients with Hypertension, Inadequately Controlled on Telmisartan 20 mg Monotherapy: A Randomized Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial
Authors
Youn, Jong-ChanKim, Eui-SoonPark, Tae HoLee, Young SooHong, Soon JunHwang, Jin-YongHan, Jung-KyuSon, Jung-WooLee, Chan JooChoi, Jung HyunKwon, Sung UkKim, Seok YeonPark, Hwan-CheolChoi, Seung-Hyuk
Issue Date
May-2026
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd
Keywords
essential hypertension; S-amlodipine; telmisartan; upfront low-dose combination therapy
Citation
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, v.20, pp 1 - 12
Pages
12
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Volume
20
Start Page
1
End Page
12
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/213293
DOI
10.2147/DDDT.S587488
ISSN
1177-8881
Abstract
Purpose: This 8-week, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose combination of telmisartan 20 mg/S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (T20/SA2.5) versus telmisartan 40 mg (T40) monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on T20. Patients and Methods: After a 4-week run-in period with T20 (baseline), patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) were randomized (1:1) to T20/SA2.5 or T40 for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in MSSBP and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) at weeks 4 and 8, BP control rate, response rate (≥20 mmHg reduction in MSSBP and ≥10 mmHg in MSDBP), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Overall, 108 patients were randomized. At week 8, least squares (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) reduction in MSSBP from baseline was greater with T20/SA2.5 than with T40 (−16.97 [2.06] mmHg vs. −7.42 [2.04] mmHg; P<0.001). LS mean (SE) reductions in MSDBP at week 8 were also greater with T20/SA2.5 than with T40 (−7.98 [1.17] mmHg vs. −4.01 [1.15] mmHg; P=0.006). The BP control rate was significantly higher with T20/SA2.5 than with T40 (53.70% vs. 29.63%; P=0.010); the response rate was numerically higher with T20/SA2.5 (12.96% vs. 5.56%; P=0.182). The incidence of TEAEs was lower with T20/SA2.5 than with T40 (9.26% vs. 20.37%, P=0.104); most events were mild. Conclusion: T20/SA2.5 demonstrated superior BP-lowering efficacy and favorable tolerability compared with T40 in patients inadequately controlled on T20, supporting the value of early low-dose combination therapy.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Hwan Cheol photo

Park, Hwan Cheol
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE