Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Would be Eligible for Treatment Based on the South Korean Reimbursement Criteriaopen access
- Authors
- Won, Chong Hyun; Park, Chun Wook; Ahn, Jiyoung; Ko, Joo Yeon; Cho, Sang Hyun; Lee, Yang Won; Lee, Joo Hee; Ng, Khai Jing; Hong, Min Young; Zhong, Jinglin; Dossenbach, Martin; Son, Sang Wook
- Issue Date
- Jun-2026
- Publisher
- WILEY
- Keywords
- atopic dermatitis; eczema; lebrikizumab; pruritus; reimbursement; Republic of Korea
- Citation
- JEADV CLINICAL PRACTICE, v.5, no.2, pp 529 - 537
- Pages
- 9
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
ESCI
- Journal Title
- JEADV CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Volume
- 5
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 529
- End Page
- 537
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/214437
- DOI
- 10.1002/jvc2.70271
- ISSN
- 2768-6566
- Abstract
- Background Lebrikizumab is approved to treat patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives This study evaluated the 16-week efficacy outcomes of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with severe AD in ADvocate trials who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement-like criteria. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive lebrikizumab or placebo every 2 weeks. Two non-mutually exclusive subgroups were selected based on South Korean reimbursement-like criteria: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score >= 23, AD duration >= 3 years, and previous use of any systemic treatment (ST subgroup) or previous treatment with cyclosporine or methotrexate (CM subgroup). Week-16 outcomes were Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with >= 2-point improvement, >= 50%/75%/90% improvement in EASI score (EASI 50/75/90), Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) >= 4-point improvement, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) >= 4-point improvement. Response rates to lebrikizumab and placebo were analysed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Common risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results The ST subgroup included 322 patients, and the CM subgroup included 111 patients. More lebrikizumab-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved outcome responses. Percentage differences in favour of lebrikizumab (p < 0.01) were: IGA (0,1): ST = 25.7% (18.2%-33.1%), CM = 20.8% (7.9%-33.7%); EASI 50: ST = 42.7% (32.5%-52.9%), CM = 36.9% (19.8%-54.0%); EASI 75: ST = 40.2% (31.4%-49.1%), CM = 33.3% (19.1%-47.5%); EASI 90: ST = 27.4% (20.3%-34.5%), CM = 22.1% (11.3%-32.8%); Pruritus NRS >= 4-point improvement: ST = 34.7% (26.7%-42.7%), CM = 26.7% (14.9%-38.4%); and DLQI >= 4-point improvement: ST = 44.2% (33.2%-55.2%), CM = 39.5% (20.2%-58.8%). Conclusions In this post-hoc, exploratory subgroup analysis, lebrikizumab improved AD skin and pruritus at week 16 in adults and adolescents who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement-like criteria.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 피부과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.