Effects of Spatial and Visual Openness in Office Environments on EEG-Based Cognitive Efficiency

Abstract

Office openness comprises two physically distinct dimensions—spatial openness and visual openness—yet studies quantifying their independent contributions to cognitive efficiency at the individual level remain scarce. Prior research has predominantly reported group-mean effects, leaving bidirectional individual responses insufficiently examined. This study independently manipulated both dimensions and measured individual-level EEG responses in 24 adults using a 3 × 3 within-subject factorial design. The beta/alpha ratio change rate was computed as an index of cognitive efficiency. Substantial neurophysiological variation across conditions was confirmed in every participant. The absence of significant group-level effects was interpreted not as a lack of environmental influence but as the result of bidirectional individual responses canceling each other out in group averages. Spatial and visual openness induced response ranges of equivalent magnitude at the individual level, and individually optimal conditions were widely distributed across the nine experimental conditions. The correspondence rate between subjective preferences and EEG-identified optimal conditions did not exceed chance, and this bidirectional cancellation mechanism is proposed as an explanation for the contradictory findings that have long characterized open-office research. These results support design strategies that offer diverse combinations of spatial and visual openness within activity-based working environments, paired with feedback systems grounded in objective cognitive performance data.