Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Low-Dose Telmisartan/Amlodipine in Essential Hypertension: A Phase III Trialopen access

Authors
Ahn, Hyo-SukAhn, Jeong-CheonCho, Jin-ManLim, Kyung HeeHan, Seung HwanCho, Yun-KyeongKim, Kye HunHong, Soon JunLee, Chan JooNa, Jin OhSung, Ki ChulChoi, KyuYoungKim, Seok-YeonKim, Dae-HeeLee, Han ChoelIhm, Sang-HyunYoun, Jong-ChanChoi, Ji-YongKim, Sang-HyunKim, Kwang-ilSung, Jung-HoonPyun, Wook BumKim, Woo-ShikCho, Jung SunLee, YongguHer, Sung-HoCho, Eun JooLee, Eun MiLee, Hae-YoungYoon, Young WonLee, Jang HoonKim, WeonRhee, Sang JaeShin, Jinho
Issue Date
May-2026
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Keywords
hypertension; low-dose therapy; randomized controlled trial; single-pill combination; telmisartan/amlodipine
Citation
Journal of Clinical Hypertension, v.28, no.5, pp 1 - 11
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Volume
28
Number
5
Start Page
1
End Page
11
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/219687
DOI
10.1111/jch.70279
ISSN
1524-6175
1751-7176
Abstract
Low-dose single-pill combinations (SPCs) are gaining recognition as an efficient therapeutic strategy for mild hypertension. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of half-dose telmisartan/amlodipine SPCs remains limited. In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase III trial, patients with essential hypertension [mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) ≥ 140 and < 180 mmHg] were allocated to four treatment arms to receive either telmisartan/amlodipine 20/2.5 mg SPC (TEL/AML 20/2.5), or monotherapy with telmisartan 20 mg (TEL 20), amlodipine 2.5 mg (AML 2.5), or telmisartan 40 mg (TEL 40) once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in MSSBP from baseline to week 8. A gatekeeping approach was used to test the superiority of TEL/AML 20/2.5 over TEL 20 and AML 2.5, followed by non-inferiority versus TEL 40. At week 8, TEL/AML 20/2.5 showed significantly greater MSSBP reductions compared with TEL 20 [least squares mean (LSM) differences: −5.79 mmHg; p = 0.0003] and AML 2.5 (−8.57 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Non-inferiority to TEL 40 was established, with an LSM difference of −3.88 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval: −6.67 to −1.09), which met the pre-specified 3 mmHg margin. The overall incidence of adverse events was 8.05%, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Overall, TEL/AML 20/2.5 SPC provided superior BP-lowering efficacy compared with TEL 20 and AML 2.5 monotherapies and was non-inferior to TEL 40. With a comparable safety profile across treatment groups, these findings suggest that TEL/AML 20/2.5 is a practical and effective option for hypertension management.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Yong gu photo

Lee, Yong gu
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE