Low-Dose Telmisartan/Amlodipine in Essential Hypertension: A Phase III Trialopen access
- Authors
- Ahn, Hyo-Suk; Ahn, Jeong-Cheon; Cho, Jin-Man; Lim, Kyung Hee; Han, Seung Hwan; Cho, Yun-Kyeong; Kim, Kye Hun; Hong, Soon Jun; Lee, Chan Joo; Na, Jin Oh; Sung, Ki Chul; Choi, KyuYoung; Kim, Seok-Yeon; Kim, Dae-Hee; Lee, Han Choel; Ihm, Sang-Hyun; Youn, Jong-Chan; Choi, Ji-Yong; Kim, Sang-Hyun; Kim, Kwang-il; Sung, Jung-Hoon; Pyun, Wook Bum; Kim, Woo-Shik; Cho, Jung Sun; Lee, Yonggu; Her, Sung-Ho; Cho, Eun Joo; Lee, Eun Mi; Lee, Hae-Young; Yoon, Young Won; Lee, Jang Hoon; Kim, Weon; Rhee, Sang Jae; Shin, Jinho
- Issue Date
- May-2026
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons Inc
- Keywords
- hypertension; low-dose therapy; randomized controlled trial; single-pill combination; telmisartan/amlodipine
- Citation
- Journal of Clinical Hypertension, v.28, no.5, pp 1 - 11
- Pages
- 11
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Journal of Clinical Hypertension
- Volume
- 28
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 11
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/219687
- DOI
- 10.1111/jch.70279
- ISSN
- 1524-6175
1751-7176
- Abstract
- Low-dose single-pill combinations (SPCs) are gaining recognition as an efficient therapeutic strategy for mild hypertension. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of half-dose telmisartan/amlodipine SPCs remains limited. In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase III trial, patients with essential hypertension [mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) ≥ 140 and < 180 mmHg] were allocated to four treatment arms to receive either telmisartan/amlodipine 20/2.5 mg SPC (TEL/AML 20/2.5), or monotherapy with telmisartan 20 mg (TEL 20), amlodipine 2.5 mg (AML 2.5), or telmisartan 40 mg (TEL 40) once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in MSSBP from baseline to week 8. A gatekeeping approach was used to test the superiority of TEL/AML 20/2.5 over TEL 20 and AML 2.5, followed by non-inferiority versus TEL 40. At week 8, TEL/AML 20/2.5 showed significantly greater MSSBP reductions compared with TEL 20 [least squares mean (LSM) differences: −5.79 mmHg; p = 0.0003] and AML 2.5 (−8.57 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Non-inferiority to TEL 40 was established, with an LSM difference of −3.88 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval: −6.67 to −1.09), which met the pre-specified 3 mmHg margin. The overall incidence of adverse events was 8.05%, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Overall, TEL/AML 20/2.5 SPC provided superior BP-lowering efficacy compared with TEL 20 and AML 2.5 monotherapies and was non-inferior to TEL 40. With a comparable safety profile across treatment groups, these findings suggest that TEL/AML 20/2.5 is a practical and effective option for hypertension management.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.