Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 13 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Role of second-look endoscopy and prophylactic hemostasis after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
Kim, Eun HyePark, Se WooNam, EunwooEun, Chang SooHan, Dong SooPark, Chan Hyuk
Issue Date
Apr-2017
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
endoscopic submucosal dissection; gastric neoplasm; hemostasis; prophylaxis; second-look endoscopy
Citation
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, v.32, no.4, pp.756 - 768
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume
32
Number
4
Start Page
756
End Page
768
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/4257
DOI
10.1111/jgh.13623
ISSN
0815-9319
Abstract
Background: Although several studies have shown that second-look endoscopy does not affect the incidence of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the potential roles of second-look endoscopy have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the role of second-look endoscopy after ESD through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This study conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through March 2016 using the keywords "second-look," " prophylactic hemostasis," " prophylactic haemostasis," " prevention," " prophylaxis," and " endoscopic submucosal dissection." Studies were included if they evaluated the incidence of post-ESD bleeding according to second-look endoscopy or prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy. Results: Four randomized controlled trials on post-ESD bleeding between second-look endoscopy and no second-look endoscopy and 12 non-randomized studies with a cohort design on post-ESD bleeding were included. On meta-analysis, second-look endoscopy did not affect delayed post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.27 [0.80-2.00], I-2 = 0%). During second-look endoscopy, patients who were considered as high-risk for post-ESD bleeding underwent prophylactic hemostasis. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who were treated with hemostasis during second-look endoscopy compared with those who were not (odds ratio [ 95% confidence interval] = 3.40 [1.87-6.18], I-2 = 62%). In patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis, the number needed to prolong a hospitalization period to avoid one additional post-ESD bleeding after discharge was 25. Conclusion: Second-look endoscopy after ESD could not reduce the risk of delayed post-ESD bleeding. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis than in those who did not.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Han, Dong Soo photo

Han, Dong Soo
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE