Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia According to the Number of High-Risk Findings at Index Colonoscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study
- Authors
- Jung, Yoon Suk; Park, Dong Il; Kim, Won Hee; Eun, Chang Soo; Park, Soo-Kyung; Ko, Bong Min; Seo, Geom Seog; Cha, Jae Myung; Park, Jae Jun; Kim, Kyeong Ok; Moon, Chang Mo; Jung, Yunho; Kim, Eun Soo; Jeon, Seong Ran; Lee, Chang Kyun
- Issue Date
- Jun-2016
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
- Keywords
- Colonoscopy; High-risk adenoma; Colorectal neoplasia; Recurrence
- Citation
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences, v.61, no.6, pp 1661 - 1668
- Pages
- 8
- Indexed
- SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Volume
- 61
- Number
- 6
- Start Page
- 1661
- End Page
- 1668
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/5582
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10620-016-4038-0
- ISSN
- 0163-2116
1573-2568
- Abstract
- Background
Data regarding outcomes for patients with multiple findings for high-risk adenomas are scarce.
Aim
To compare the risk for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) recurrence according to the number of high-risk findings.
Methods
This was a retrospective and multicenter study. Patients who had one or more high-risk adenomas at the index colonoscopy and underwent follow-up colonoscopy 2.5 or more years after the index colonoscopy were included. The number of high-risk findings was defined as follows: number of adenomas larger than 1 cm + number of adenomas with HGD + number of adenomas with a villous component + existence (counted as 1) or nonexistence (counted as 0) of three or more adenomas.
Results
A total of 1646 patients were included, and the mean duration between index and follow-up colonoscopy was approximately 4 years. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent advanced CRN in patients with three or more high-risk findings was higher than that in patients with one or two high-risk findings (p < 0.001). However, the difference in 3-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrent advanced CRN between the two groups was not great, although it was statistically significant (4.8 vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.039).
Conclusions
A 3-year surveillance interval for patients with multiple high-risk findings, regardless of the number of high-risk findings, appears reasonable.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.