Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Comparing ICS + LABA with ICS + LABA + LAMA in Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) Treatment: The ACO Treatment with Optimal Medications (ATOMIC) Study

Authors
Park, So-YoungKim, SolmiKim, Jung-HyunKim, Sae-HoonLee, TaehoonYoon, Sun-YoungKim, Min-HyeMoon, Ji-YongYang, Min-SukJung, Jae-WooKim, Joo-HeeChoi, Jeong-HeePark, Chan SunKim, SujeongLee, JaechunKwon, Jae-WooHur, Gyu YoungKim, Sang-HaKim, Hee-KyooShin, Yoo SeobKim, Sang-HoonNam, Young-HeeJang, An-SooPark, Seo YoungKim, Tae-Bum
Issue Date
Mar-2021
Publisher
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Keywords
Asthma-COPD overlap; ICS; LABA; LAMA; Triple therapy
Citation
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, v.9, no.3, pp.1304 - 1311.e2
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume
9
Number
3
Start Page
1304
End Page
1311.e2
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/7973
DOI
10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.066
ISSN
2213-2198
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) recommend initial treatment using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus 1 or more bronchodilators. Objective: To clarify which therapeutic effect is better between the ICS + long-acting β₂ agonist (LABA) and ICS + LABA + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) treatment in patients with ACO. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, 48-week, randomized, noninferiority trial. Patients with ACO were enrolled if they were treated with a moderate to high dose of ICS + LABA. In total, 303 patients were involved in the present trial, with 149 receiving ICS + LABA + LAMA. The primary end point was the time to first exacerbation. Secondary outcomes included changes in FEV1, forced vital capacity, FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio, asthma control, blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Results: In the ICS + LABA treatment group, 29 of 154 patients (18.83%) experienced exacerbation, whereas 28 of 149 patients (18.79%) experienced exacerbation in the ICS + LABA + LAMA treatment group. The results of this noninferiority study were ultimately inconclusive (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.66-1.84). However, the patients treated with the addition of LAMA showed significant improvements in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (P < .001). Asthma control did not improve in either group. Conclusions: Although this study was unable to conclude that ICS + LABA treatment is not inferior to ICS + LABA + LAMA in terms of exacerbation, it is obvious that the ICS + LABA + LAMA treatment group had improved lung function in ACO.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE