Comparison of interactivity performance of linux CFS and windows 10 CPU schedulers
- Authors
- Fan; W.-C.; Wong; C.-S.; Lee, Wai Kong; W.-K.; Hwang, Seongoun; S.-O.
- Issue Date
- 2020
- Publisher
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- Keywords
- Interactivity; Interbench; Linux; Windows
- Citation
- Proceedings - 2020 International Conference on Green and Human Information Technology, ICGHIT 2020, pp.31 - 34
- Journal Title
- Proceedings - 2020 International Conference on Green and Human Information Technology, ICGHIT 2020
- Start Page
- 31
- End Page
- 34
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/12484
- DOI
- 10.1109/ICGHIT49656.2020.00014
- ISSN
- 0000-0000
- Abstract
- One of the main goals of a user-oriented operating system design is to ensure low response time of interactive tasks. Otherwise, high scheduling latencies will become obvious to the user and will in turn affect the user experience. One of the most popular benchmarks that can measure interactive tasks response time is Interbench. However, Interbench was only available in Linux, thus making interactivity performance benchmarking for other operating systems impossible. This research ported the Interbench to Windows operating system so that the interactive performance of Windows and Linux can be evaluated and compared. We studied the effect of various simulated workloads on interactive performance of both operating systems and concluded that the Linux CPU scheduler tends to have lower latencies than Windows 10 in most scenarios, except when a heavy background load is executed concurrently with heavy load interactive task. © 2020 IEEE.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Science and Technology > Department of Computer and Information Communications Engineering > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.