2D 도면의 한계 인식을 통한 BIM 도면화의 필요성에 관한 연구- 4차 산업혁명 시대의 패러다임 전환을 중심으로 -

Abstract

With the shift of paradigm toward the 4th industrial revolution, rather than a simple accumulation of the information, there are greater value and emphasis in connecting and converging the information. In order to improve the quality of information, it is necessary to rapidly sort useful information and post-process data. This processed information can be transformed into higher knowledge that is utilized by a greater community beyond the individual in a setting where the knowledge can be exchanged freely. Digitization has emerged as a hot topic in all industries to support the needs of processing and improving the qualities of large amounts of data in modern society. However, the current construction industry with a 2D recording system remains in the traditional paradigm, subdividing to represent various types of information without fully digitizing information of each facility. This is the lowest level of information form which is simply listing phenomena or facts. This does not only prevent relating information but also limits the conversation into social knowledge because it depends on the tacit knowledge of a specific expert. To improve this situation, the BIM (Building Information Modeling) system has appeared in the field of architecture to improve the quality of existing construction information by technically supporting data filtering, information processing, knowledge sharing, and expansion to a digital platform. By combining these technologies, BIM drawing can increase the efficiency of information delivery, the flexibility of reflection, the economic feasibility of writing tasks, and the scalability of digital use, and improve the limitations of the current traditional book system. However, it seems that BIM is not fully applied in practice due to various obstacles that prevent its practical implementation. Today's architecture is becoming more sophisticated due to additional factors such as environmental friendliness, economic feasibility, and smart systems in addition to the original three required elements (structure, function, and beauty) that have been traditionally required. In order to adhere to the introduction of a new system in response to the ever-increasing requirements and the changing technological environment, the true change will start from clearly recognizing the limitations of the existing system and clearly understanding the background and possibility of the new technology.