K-EP(K-Engineering Professional) 자격을 위한 졸업생역량 평가방안 연구A Study on Graduate Attributes Assessment for K-EP (K-Engineering Professional) Qualification
- Other Titles
- A Study on Graduate Attributes Assessment for K-EP (K-Engineering Professional) Qualification
- Authors
- 최세휴; 강상희; 김정수; 윤지영
- Issue Date
- 2021
- Publisher
- 한국공학교육학회
- Keywords
- Program outcomes(Graduate attributes); Program outcomes(Graduate attributes) assessment; Engineering education accreditation; Engineering professional; Certification; Qualification; Multiple-choice test for PO evaluation
- Citation
- 공학교육연구, v.24, no.6, pp.30 - 39
- Journal Title
- 공학교육연구
- Volume
- 24
- Number
- 6
- Start Page
- 30
- End Page
- 39
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/21022
- DOI
- 10.18108/jeer.2021.24.6.30
- ISSN
- 1738-6454
- Abstract
- The present study aims to demonstrate that it is possible to objectively evaluate the competency (referred to as graduate attributes or program outcomes) of graduates of engineering education programs. To strengthen the link between engineering education accreditation and the qualification/certification system of engineering professionals, referred to as K-Engineering Professional (K-EP), individually assuring the quality of accredited graduates using multiple-choice test as main assessment tool is proposed. Test questions related to the basic vocational skills of NCS are developed for seven of the 10 program outcomes of the ABEEK KEC2015. The three program outcomes, PO1, PO3, and PO5, which need to fully accommodate the characteristics of each disciplinary field, are excluded. A pilot test involving graduates of eight accredited programs is conducted. Applying on Rasch model based on Item Response Theory (IRT), the item difficulty, fit and discrimination of multiple choice test are demonstrated. The pilot study strongly suggests that individual competency evaluation is possible at a certain level for seven program outcomes tested. For PO1, PO3, and PO5, however, questions that address the characteristics of each disciplinary field need to be devised. If a suitable pool of questions is built, it can be used as a program outcomes assessment tool by the accredited programs.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Engineering > Department of Mechanical and System Design Engineering > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.