Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

RTP-Based Residential Energy Consumption Scheduling Model with an Energy Storage System as an Independent ProviderRTP-Based Residential Energy Consumption Scheduling Model with an Energy Storage System as an Independent Provider

Other Titles
RTP-Based Residential Energy Consumption Scheduling Model with an Energy Storage System as an Independent Provider
Authors
Kim, SehwanOk, ChangsooSeok, Hyesung
Issue Date
1-Jul-2022
Publisher
SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
Keywords
Demand response; Distributed decision making; Fairness; Smart grids; Stackelberg game
Citation
JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, v.17, no.4, pp.2135 - 2149
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Volume
17
Number
4
Start Page
2135
End Page
2149
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/27568
DOI
10.1007/s42835-022-01046-x
ISSN
1975-0102
Abstract
Various real-time pricing (RTP)-based residential consumption scheduling models have been developed to deal with the blackout problem and supply electricity more stably. However, most RTP-based models cause a rebound peak problem. Hence, we propose an innovative RTP-based model with an energy storage system (ESS) as an independent power provider, which is a more reliable and practical solution (called RTP with ESS in this study) than previous models. The price competition between the ESS power provider and wholesale market reduces the power consumption cost of the consumer and peak load of the supply. We compared three models: (1) Non-scheduling, (2) RTP-based Scheduling, and (3) RTP with ESS Scheduling models. Test results reveal that the RTP with ESS Scheduling model reduced consumer power usage costs by 35.24% and 25.86% more than the two models above, respectively. In addition, the RTP with ESS Scheduling model reduced the peak-to-average power ratio of power consumption by 35.10% and 8.71% more than those of the non-scheduling and the existing RTP models, respectively. The consumer standard deviation of power consumption cost was 25.70% and 49.25% lower than those of the non-scheduling and existing RTP models, respectively, and had a fair distribution of power usage costs.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Seok, Hye sung photo

Seok, Hye sung
Engineering (Department of Industrial and Data Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE