Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Improving the prediction of wildfire susceptibility on Hawaiʻi Island, Hawaiʻi, using explainable hybrid machine learning models

Authors
Tran, Trang Thi KieuJanizadeh, SaeidBateni, Sayed M.Jun, ChanghyunKim, DongkyunTrauernicht, ClayRezaie, FatemehGiambelluca, Thomas W.Panahi, Mahdi
Issue Date
Feb-2024
Publisher
Academic Press
Keywords
Black widow optimization; Butterfly optimization; Hawaiʻi; Whale optimization; Wildfire susceptibility mapping
Citation
Journal of Environmental Management, v.351
Journal Title
Journal of Environmental Management
Volume
351
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/32343
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119724
ISSN
0301-4797
1095-8630
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of four Machine Learning (ML) models used to map wildfire susceptibility on Hawaiʻi Island, Hawaiʻi. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) combined with three meta-heuristic algorithms – Whale Optimization (WOA), Black Widow Optimization (BWO), and Butterfly Optimization (BOA) – were employed to map areas susceptible to wildfire. To generate a wildfire inventory, 1408 wildfire points were identified within the study area from 2004 to 2022. The four ML models (XGBoost, WOA-XGBoost, BWO-XGBoost, and BOA-XGBoost) were run using 14 wildfire-conditioning factors categorized into four main groups: topographical, meteorological, vegetation, and anthropogenic. Six performance metrics – sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC), and the average precision (AP) of Precision–Recall Curves (PRCs) – were used to compare the predictive performance of the ML models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was also used to interpret the importance values of the 14 influential variables for the modeling of wildfire on Hawaiʻi Island using the four models. The results of the wildfire modeling indicated that all four models performed well, with the BWO-XGBoost model exhibiting a slightly higher prediction performance (AUC = 0.9269), followed by WOA-XGBoost (AUC = 0.9253), BOA-XGBoost (AUC = 0.9232), and XGBoost (AUC = 0.9164). SHAP analysis revealed that the distance from a road, annual temperature, and elevation were the most influential factors. The wildfire susceptibility maps generated in this study can be used by local authorities for wildfire management and fire suppression activity. © 2023
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Civil and Environmental Engineering > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Dong Kyun photo

Kim, Dong Kyun
Engineering (Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE