Detailed Information

Cited 32 time in webofscience Cited 33 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Prosodically-conditioned fine-tuning of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in English

Authors
Cho, TaehongKim, DaejinKim, Sahyang
Issue Date
Sep-2017
Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Keywords
Vowel nasalization; Coarticulation; Coarticulatory resistance; Prosodic strengthening; Prominence; Boundary; Phonetic grammar
Citation
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, v.64, pp.71 - 89
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS
Volume
64
Start Page
71
End Page
89
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/5333
DOI
10.1016/j.wocn.2016.12.003
ISSN
0095-4470
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between prosodic strengthening and linguistic contrasts in English by examining temporal realization of nasals (N-duration) in CV (N) under bar# and #(N) under bar VC, and their coarticulatory influence on vowels (V-nasalization). Results show that different sources of prosodic strengthening bring about different types of linguistic contrasts. Prominence enhances the consonants [nasality] as reflected in an elongation of N duration, but it enhances the vowel's [orality] (rather than [nasality]) showing coarticulatory resistance to the nasal influence even when the nasal is phonologically focused (e.g., mob-bob; bomb-bob). Boundary strength induces different types of enhancement patterns as a function of prosodic position (initial vs. final). In the domain-initial position, boundary strength reduces the consonant's [nasality] as evident in a shortening of N-duration and a reduction of V-nasalization, thus enhancing CV contrast. The opposite is true with the domain-final nasal in which N-duration is lengthened accompanied by greater V-nasalization, showing coarticulatory vulnerability. The systematic coarticulatory variation as a function of prosodic factors indicates that V-nasalization as a coarticulatory process is indeed under speaker control, fine-tuned in a linguistically significant way. In dynamical terms, these results may be seen as coming from differential intergestural coupling relationships that may underlie the difference in V-nasalization in CVN# vs. #NVC. It is proposed that the timing initially determined by such coupling relationships must be fine-tuned by prosodic strengthening in a way that reflects the relationship between dynamical underpinnings of speech timing and linguistic contrasts. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Education > Department of English Education > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Sahyang photo

Kim, Sahyang
Education (English Education)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE