근대 건축문화유산 보존·재생에 관련한 법제도의 한일 비교연구

Abstract

More than 100 years have been passed since importation of Western and/or Modern Architecture into Korea and Japan. Many of those have been kept demolishing due to economical, political and other reasons without considering their cultural meaning. In order to preserve and regenerate Architecture in Modern Era, it is necessary to rearrange the given conditions, as a first step. Related regulations are one of the most essential conditions for the preservation and regeneration. Their system and vocabularies are very similar comparing other countries like the West, but showing differences in their way of revising regulations and operating systems. The analysis suggests three remedies as follows. Registration system of cultural property is the most effective way to preserve and regenerate Architecture in modern era. Those regulations have to be keep revising according to the situation that keeps changing day by day, while the standard, that judges importance of an architecture, stays still. Also cooperation of government, academy and citizen is an critical requirement, too.