Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Integrative Protein-Based Prognostic Model for Early-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer

Authors
Yang, Ji-YeonWerner, Henrica M. J.Li, JieWestin, Shannon N.Lu, YilingHalle, Mari K.Trovik, JoneSalvesen, Helga B.Mills, Gordon B.Liang, Han
Issue Date
15-Jan-2016
Publisher
AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
Citation
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, v.22, no.2, pp 513 - 523
Pages
11
Journal Title
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume
22
Number
2
Start Page
513
End Page
523
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/kumoh/handle/2020.sw.kumoh/22496
DOI
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0104
ISSN
1078-0432
1557-3265
Abstract
Purpose: Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) is the major histologic type of endometrial cancer, the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy in the United States. EEC recurrence or metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. Early-stage EEC is generally curable, but a subset has high risk of recurrence or metastasis. Prognosis estimation for early-stage EEC mainly relies on clinicopathologic characteristics, but is unreliable. We aimed to identify patients with high-risk early-stage EEC who are most likely to benefit from more extensive surgery and adjuvant therapy by building a prognostic model that integrates clinical variables and protein markers. Experimental Design: We used two large, independent early-stage EEC datasets as training (n = 183) and validation cohorts (n = 333), and generated the levels of 186 proteins and phosphoproteins using reverse-phase protein arrays. By applying an initial filtering and the elastic net to the training samples, we developed a prognostic model for overall survival containing two clinical variables and 18 protein markers and optimized the risk group classification. Results: The Kaplan-Meier survival analyses in the validation cohort confirmed an improved discriminating power of our prognostic model for patients with early-stage EEC over key clinical variables (log-rank test, P = 0.565 for disease stage, 0.567 for tumor grade, and 1.3 x 10(-4) for the integrative model). Compared with clinical variables (stage, grade, and patient age), only the risk groups defined by the integrative model were consistently significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses across both cohorts. Conclusions: Our prognostic model is potentially of high clinical value for stratifying patients with early-stage EEC and improving their treatment strategies. (C)2015 AACR.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Department of Applied Mathematics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE