Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 15 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of pronase as mucolytic agent on imaging quality of magnifying endoscopy

Authors
Kim, Gwang HaCho, Yu KyungCha, Jae MyungLee, Sun-YoungChung, Il-Kwun
Issue Date
28-Feb-2015
Publisher
Baishideng Publishing Group
Keywords
Pronase; Narrow-band imaging, Endoscopy; Image enhancement; Randomized controlled trial
Citation
World Journal of Gastroenterology, v.21, no.8, pp 2483 - 2489
Pages
7
Journal Title
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume
21
Number
8
Start Page
2483
End Page
2489
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/10865
DOI
10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2483
ISSN
1007-9327
2219-2840
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of premedication with pronase, a proteolytic enzyme, in improving image quality during magnifying endoscopy. METHODS: The study was of a blinded, randomized, prospective design. Patients were assigned to groups administered oral premedication of either pronase and simethicone (Group A) or simethicone alone (Group B). First, the gastric mucosal visibility grade (1-4) was determined during conventional endoscopy, and then a magnifying endoscopic examination was conducted. The quality of images obtained by magnifying endoscopy at the stomach and the esophagus was scored from 1 to 3, with a lower score indicating better visibility. The endoscopist used water flushes as needed to obtain satisfactory magnifying endoscopic views. The main study outcomes were the visibility scores during magnifying endoscopy and the number of water flushes. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were enrolled, and data from 143 patients (M:F = 90: 53, mean age 57.5 years) were analyzed. The visibility score was significantly higher in the stomach following premedication with pronase (73% with a score of 1 in Group A vs 49% in Group B, P < 0.05), but there was no difference in the esophagus visibility scores (67% with a score of 1 in Group A vs 58% in Group B). Fewer water flushes [mean 0.7 +/- 0.9 times (range: 0-3 times) in Group A vs 1.9 +/- 1.5 times (range: 0-6 times) in Group B, P < 0.05] in the pronase premedication group did not affect the endoscopic procedure times [mean 766 s (range: 647-866 s) for Group A vs 760 s (range: 678-854 s) for Group B, P = 0.88]. The total gastric mucosal visibility score was also lower in Group A (4.9 +/- 1.5 vs 8.3 +/- 1.8 in Group B, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The addition of pronase to simethicone premedication resulted in clearer images during magnifying endoscopy and reduced the need for water flushes.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Internal Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Chung, Il Kwun photo

Chung, Il Kwun
College of Medicine (Department of Internal Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE