The Relationship between a Spouse’s Alcohol Use Disorder and Family CommunicationThe Relationship between a Spouse’s Alcohol Use Disorder and Family Communication
- Other Titles
- The Relationship between a Spouse’s Alcohol Use Disorder and Family Communication
- Authors
- Hyuk Ju Kwon; Tae Kwan Ahn; Jung Ah Lee; 선우성; 김영식; Byung-Soo Kim; Tae Hee Jeon; Byung Yeon Yu; 유병욱; 박경채; Sun Wha Ok
- Issue Date
- 2015
- Publisher
- 대한가정의학회
- Keywords
- Alcohol Use Disorder; Family Functioning; Family Communication
- Citation
- Korean Journal of Family Medicine, v.36, no.2, pp 92 - 102
- Pages
- 11
- Journal Title
- Korean Journal of Family Medicine
- Volume
- 36
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 92
- End Page
- 102
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/11424
- ISSN
- 2005-6443
2092-6715
- Abstract
- Ba ckground: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) affects not only an individual’s health but also their family. Thisstudy was conducted to examine effects of a spouse’s AUD on family functioning and family communication.
Me thods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 890 participants (445 couples) in a Koreanfamily cohort in primary care. Participants with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in Koreascores of 8 or greater were classified into an AUD group. Family functioning was classified into threegroups (balanced, midrange, and extreme) using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES)-III questionnaire, and then reclassified into two groups (appropriate and extreme groups) for binominalanalyses. Family communication was classified into three groups (high, moderate, and low) using theFamily Communication Scale, FACES-IV, and also reclassified into two groups (good and poor).
Re sults: There was no significant difference in adaptability and cohesion between both male and femaleparticipants with a spouse with AUD and participants with a spouse without AUD. Using multivariatelogistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in family typeand communication between the two groups in males. However, there was a significant decrease in familycommunication (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 3.58) in females with a spouse with AUDcompared to females with a spouse without AUD, even after adjusting for the participant’s own AUD.
Co nclusion: In females, family communication is significantly worse when spouses have AUD. Thissuggests that a husband’s alcohol consumption has negative effects on his wife’s family communication.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Family Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/11424)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.