Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Validation of a Web-Based Tool to Predict the Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence (IBTR! 2.0) after Breast-Conserving Therapy for Korean Patients

Authors
Jung, Seung PilHur, Sung MoLee, Se KyungKim, SangminChoi, Min-YoungBae, Soo YounKim, JiyoungKim, Min KukKil, Won HoChoe, Jun-HoKim, Jung-HanKim, Jee SooNam, Seok JinBae, Jeoung WonLee, Jeong Eon
Issue Date
Mar-2013
Publisher
한국유방암학회
Keywords
Breast neoplasms; Nomograms; Radiotherapy Recurrence; Validation studies
Citation
Journal of Breast Cancer, v.16, no.1, pp 97 - 103
Pages
7
Journal Title
Journal of Breast Cancer
Volume
16
Number
1
Start Page
97
End Page
103
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/13881
DOI
10.4048/jbc.2013.16.1.97
ISSN
1738-6756
2092-9900
Abstract
Purpose: IBTR! 2.0 is a web-based nomogram that predicts the 10-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate after breast-conserving therapy. We validated this nomogram in Korean patients. Methods: The nomogram was tested for 520 Korean patients, who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy. Predicted and observed 10-year outcomes were compared for the entire cohort and for each group, predefined by nomogram-predicted risks: group 1, <3%; group 2, 3% to 5%; group 3, 5% to 10%; group 4, >10%. Results: In overall patients, the overall 10 year predicted and observed estimates of IBTR were 5.22% and 5.70% (p=0.68). In group 1, (n=124), the predicted and observed estimates were 2.25% and 1.80% (p=0.73), in group 2 (n=177), 3.95% and 3.90% (p=0.97), in group 3 (n=181), 7.14% and 8.80% (p=0.42), and in group 4 (n=38), 11.66% and 14.90% (p = 0.73), respectively. Conclusion: In a previous validation of this nomogram based on American patients, nomogram-predicted IBTR rates were overestimated in the high-risk subgroup. However, our results based on Korean patients showed that the observed IBTR was higher than the predicted estimates in groups 3 and 4. This difference may arise from ethnic differences, as well as from the methods used to detect IBTR and the healthcare environment. IBTR! 2.0 may be considered as an acceptable nomogram in Korean patients with low- to moderate-risk of in-breast recurrence. Before widespread use of this:nomogram, the IBTRI 2.0 needs a larger validation study and continuous modification.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of General Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hur, Sung Mo photo

Hur, Sung Mo
College of Medicine (Department of General Surgery)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE