Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

한국스포츠중재위원회에 관한 법정책적 고찰The Legal and Politic Considerations on Korea Sports Arbitration Committee

Other Titles
The Legal and Politic Considerations on Korea Sports Arbitration Committee
Authors
김상태
Issue Date
2013
Publisher
한양법학회
Keywords
Sports Law; Sports Dispute; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Sports Arbitration; Korea Sports Arbitration Committee; 스포츠법; 스포츠분쟁; 대체적 분쟁해결제도; 스포츠중재; 한국스포츠중재위원회
Citation
한양법학, v.24, no.2, pp.53 - 72
Journal Title
한양법학
Volume
24
Number
2
Start Page
53
End Page
72
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/14409
ISSN
1226-8062
Abstract
In addition to development of sports industry and culture, disputes of different forms are occurring in sports area. As a result, new dispute solution system might be need to solve rapidly and efficiently sports disputes. In 2006, Korean Sports Arbitration Committee(KSAC) was established by this necessity. However, KSAC was actually abolished in 2009 because of management insufficiency and budget waste. But, the question of maintenance or abolition of sport arbitration organization must not be decided according to management logic simply of management insufficiency and budget waste. And, consider to necessity of sport arbitration and international tendency, KSAC that professionalize sports disputes is urgently needed and should be reinstated. There are, however, a few improvements to get the most out of specialized sport arbitration organization. First, KSAC should be decolonized from Korean Olympic Committee as well as sports administration organization in organizational and financial aspects. Second, it is necessary to recognize priority and monopolistic jurisdiction for revive KSAC. Third, KSAC should be formed members that interests does not exist from sports organizations like Korean Olympic Committee. Fourth, the expansion of the judge scope and regulation on protection of third parties has to be instituted. Fifth, regarding legal effect of arbitral award, if is possible, not to give the force of the law like an irrevocable judgment. Sixth, it should be enact supplementary laws and regulations that can be disobedient and litigate in arbitral award. At this time, must flow KSAC to litigate. Finally it should be reappraise terminology of KSAC to prevent confusion that can happen to concept of Arbitration.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Humanities and Social Sciences > Department of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Sang Tae photo

Kim, Sang Tae
College of Humanities and Social Sciences (Department of Law)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE