Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Korean Translation of the GRADE Series Published in the BMJ, ‘GRADE: Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies’ (A Secondary Publication)Korean Translation of the GRADE Series Published in the BMJ, ‘GRADE: Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies’ (A Secondary Publication)

Other Titles
Korean Translation of the GRADE Series Published in the BMJ, ‘GRADE: Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies’ (A Secondary Publication)
Authors
정재흥Do Kyung Kim강호원Ja Yoon KuHyun Jin JungHong Wook KimEu Chang HwangGuideline Development Committee in the Kor. Ass. of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation
Issue Date
2020
Publisher
대한요로생식기감염학회
Keywords
.
Citation
Urogenital Tract Infection, v.15, no.1, pp.16 - 25
Journal Title
Urogenital Tract Infection
Volume
15
Number
1
Start Page
16
End Page
25
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/19642
DOI
10.14777/uti.2020.15.1.16
ISSN
2465-8243
Abstract
This article is the fourth translation of a GRADE series published in the BMJ, which graded the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests or strategies, as a comprehensive and transparent approach for developing re-commendations. Randomized trials for diagnostic approaches represent the ideal study design for intervention studies. On the other hand, cross-sectional or cohort studies with a direct comparison of the test results with an appropriate reference standard can provide high-quality evidence. The guideline panel must be reminded that the test accuracy is a surrogate for patient-important outcomes, so such studies often provide a low quality of evidence for recommendations regarding diagnostic tests, even when the studies do not have serious limitations. Diagnostic accuracy studies showing that a diagnostic test or strategy improves important patient outcomes will require the availability of effective treatment, reduction of test- related adverse effects or anxiety, or improvement of the patients’ well-being from prognostic information. Therefore, it is important to assess the directness of the test results regarding the consequences of diagnostic recommendations that are im-portant to patients.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Urology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE