Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study

Authors
Han, Jae HeeKim, Hyun GunAhn, Eu MiPark, SuyeonJeon, Seong RanCha, Jae MyungKwak, Min SeobJung, Yun hoShin, Jeong EunShin, Hyun DeokCho, Young-Seok
Issue Date
Sep-2022
Publisher
거트앤리버 발행위원회
Keywords
E-mail medgun@schmc; ac; kr; Key Words; Colonoscopy; Adenoma; Miss rate; Quality indicator
Citation
Gut and Liver, v.16, no.5, pp 716 - 725
Pages
10
Journal Title
Gut and Liver
Volume
16
Number
5
Start Page
716
End Page
725
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/21696
DOI
10.5009/gnl210287
ISSN
1976-2283
2005-1212
Abstract
Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) does not reflect the complete detection of every adenoma during colonoscopy; thus, many surrogate indicators have been suggested. This study investigated whether the ADR and surrogate quality indicators reflect the adenoma miss rate (AMR) when performing qualified colonoscopy. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic examinees aged 50 to 75 years who underwent back-to-back screening colonoscopies by eight endoscopists. The ADR and surrogate quality indicators, including polyp detection rate, total number of adenomas per colonoscopy, additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy (ADR-Plus), and total number of adenomas per positive participant, were calculated for the prediction of AMR. Results: A total of 371 back-to-back colonoscopies were performed. There was a significant difference in ADRs (range, 44% to 75.4%; p=0.024), polyp detection rates (range, 56% to 86.9%; p=0.008) and adenomas per positive participants (range, 1.19 to 2.30; p=0.038), and a tendency of a difference in adenomas per colonoscopy (range, 0.62 to 1.31; p=0.051) and ADR-Plus (range, 0.13 to 0.70; p=0.054) among the endoscopists. The overall AMR was 20.1%, and AMRs were not different (range, 13.9 to 28.6; p>0.05) among the endoscopists. No quality indicators were significantly correlated with AMR. The number of adenomas found during the first colonoscopy was an independent factor for increased AMR (odds ratio, 1.79; p<0.001). Conclusions: The colonoscopy quality indicators were significantly different among high-ADR endoscopists, and none of the quality indicators reflected the AMR of good quality colonoscopy performances. The only factor influencing AMR was the number of adenomas detected during colonoscopy. (Gut Liver, Published online December 21, 2021)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Internal Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
College of Medicine > Department of Internal Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jung, Yun ho photo

Jung, Yun ho
College of Medicine (Department of Internal Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE