Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE studyopen access
- Authors
- Kim, Jeeyeon; Kim, Hyun Gun; Kim, Kyeong Ok; Kim, Hyung Wook; Park, Jongha; Byeon, Jeong-Sik; Hwang, Sung-Wook; Shin, Hyun Deok; Shin, Jeong Eun; Yang, Hyo-Joon; Lee, Hyun Seok; Jung, Yunho; Cho, Young-Seok; Joo, Young Eun; Myung, Dae-Seong; Huh, Kyu Chan; Ahn, Eu Mi
- Issue Date
- Jul-2019
- Publisher
- 대한장연구학회
- Keywords
- Colonoscopy; Bowel preparation; Oral sulfate solution; Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate
- Citation
- Intestinal research, v.17, no.3, pp 413 - 418
- Pages
- 6
- Journal Title
- Intestinal research
- Volume
- 17
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 413
- End Page
- 418
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/4417
- DOI
- 10.5217/ir.2018.00156
- ISSN
- 1598-9100
2288-1956
- Abstract
- Background/Aims: This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS). Methods: A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. 'Ihe adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups. Results: This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P> 0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P> 0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P> 0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008). Conclusions: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Internal Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
- College of Medicine > Department of Internal Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.