A comparative study of intraoral versus retromandibular approach in the management of subcondylar fracture

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and effectiveness between intraoral approach and retromandibular approach for treatment of subcondylar fracture of mandible.MethodsBetween March 2011 and October 2013, 24 patients with subcondylar fractures of the mandible were treated by a single surgeon with an intraoral approach using an angulated screwdriver (n=14) or by another surgeon using a retromandibular approach (n=10). The interincisal distance was measured 1week (T0), 6weeks (T1), 3months (T2), and 6months (T3) postoperatively. We also compare the average operation time and the cost of operation between the two groups.ResultsAt 6months postoperatively, all 24 patients achieved satisfactory ranges of temporomandibular joint movement, with an interincisal distance >40mm without deviation and with stable centric occlusion. The intraoral group had the median interincisal distance of 14mm at T0, 38mm at T1, 42.5mm at T2, and 43mm at T3, while the retromandibular group had that of 15, 29, 35, and 42.5mm respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the intraoral and the retromandibular group at T0 and T4. However, significant differences were noted T1 and T2 (p<0.01). The differences of average operation time between the intraoral (81min) and retromandibular group (45min) were statistically significant (p<0.01). The cost of an operation was 369.968.14 (United States dollar [USD]) in intraoral group and was 345.48 +/- 0.0 (USD) in retromandibular group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.01).Conclusion p id=Par4 In open reduction of a subcondylar fracture of the mandible, a intraoral approach using an angulated screwdriver is superior to the retromandibular approach in terms of interincisal distance, although the operation time is longer.