Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 13 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Can Short-Term Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined With Visual Biofeedback Training Improve Hemiplegic Upper Limb Function of Subacute Stroke Patients?

Authors
Seok, HyunLee, Seung YeolKim, JihoonYeo, JunghoKang, Hyungdong
Issue Date
Dec-2016
Publisher
대한재활의학회
Keywords
Constraint-induced movement therapy; Biofeedback; Stroke
Citation
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, v.40, no.6, pp 998 - 1009
Pages
12
Journal Title
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume
40
Number
6
Start Page
998
End Page
1009
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/8560
DOI
10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.998
ISSN
2234-0645
2234-0653
Abstract
Objective To Investigate the synergic effects of short-term constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and visual biofeedback training (VBT) in subacute stroke patients. Methods Thirty-two subacute stroke patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: short-term CIMT with VBT, VBT only, and control groups. We applied CIMT for an hour daily during VBT instead of the ordinary restraint time, referred to as 'short-term' CIMT. Short-term CIMT with VBT group received simultaneous VBT with CIMT, whereas the VBT the only group received VBT without CIMT for an hour a day for 2 weeks. The control group received conventional occupational therapy (OT) alone. Patients underwent the Purdue Pegboard Test, the JAMAR grip strength test, the Wolf Motor Function Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper extremity), Motricity index and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index test to evaluate motor functions of the hemiplegic upper limb at baseline, post-treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment. Results No significant differences were observed between short-term CIMT with VBT and VBT only groups. Both groups showed significantly higher scores compared to the control group in the WMFT and FMA tests. However, the short-term CIMT with VBT group showed significant improvement (p<0.05) compared with the control group in both grasp and pad pinch at post-treatment and 2 weeks after treatment while the VBT only group did not. Conclusion Short-term CIMT with VBT group did not show significant improvement of hemiplegic upper limb function of subacute stroke patients, compared to VBT only group. Larger sample sizes and different restraint times would be needed to clarify the effect.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Seung Yeol photo

Lee, Seung Yeol
College of Medicine (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE