Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 14 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Current Smoking Status Is Associated With Lower Quantitative CT Measures of Emphysema and Gas Trapping

Authors
Zach, Jordan A.Williams, AndreJou, Sung-ShiickYagihashi, KunihiroEverett, DouglasHokanson, John E.Stinson, DouglasLynch, David A.
Issue Date
Jan-2016
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Keywords
air trapping; smoking; emphysema; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; quantitative computed tomography
Citation
Journal of Thoracic Imaging, v.31, no.1, pp 29 - 36
Pages
8
Journal Title
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Volume
31
Number
1
Start Page
29
End Page
36
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/9468
DOI
10.1097/RTI.0000000000000181
ISSN
0883-5993
1536-0237
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of smoking status on quantitative computed tomography CT measures of low-attenuation areas (LAAs) on inspiratory and expiratory CT and to provide a method of adjusting for this effect. Materials and Methods: A total of 6762 current and former smokers underwent spirometry and volumetric inspiratory and expiratory CT. Quantitative CT analysis was completed using open-source 3D Slicer software. LAAs were defined as lung voxels with attenuation values <=-950 Hounsfield units (HU) on inspiratory CT and <=-856 HU on expiratory CT and were expressed as percentage of CT lung volume (%LAA(I-950) and %LAA(E-856)). Multiple linear regression was used to determine the effect of smoking status on %LAA(I-950) and %LAA(E-856) while controlling for demographic variables, spirometric lung function, and smoking history, as well as total lung capacity (%LAA(I-950)) or functional residual capacity (%LAA(E-856)). Quantile normalization was used to align the %LAA(I-950) distributions for current and former smokers. Results: Mean %LAA(I-950) was 4.2 +/- 7.1 in current smokers and 7.7 +/- 9.7 in former smokers (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, %LAA(I-950) was 3.5 percentage points lower and %LAA(E-856) was 6.0 percentage points lower in current smokers than in former smokers (P < 0.001). After quantile normalization, smoking status was an insignificant variable in the inspiratory regression model, with %LAA(I-950) being 0.27 percentage points higher in current smokers (P=0.13). Conclusions: After adjusting for patient demographics and lung function, current smokers display significantly lower %LAA(I-950) and %LAA(E-856) than do former smokers. Potential methods for adjusting for this effect would include adding a fixed value (eg, 3.5%) to the calculated percentage of emphysema in current smokers, or quantile normalization.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Radiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE