Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Intractable middle ear effusion in EGPA patients might cause permanent hearing loss: a case–control studyopen access

Authors
Kang, N.[Kang, N.]Shin, J.[Shin, J.]Cho, Y.-S.[Cho, Y.-S.]Lee, J.-Y.[Lee, J.-Y.]Lee, B.-J.[Lee, B.-J.]Choi, D.-C.[Choi, D.-C.]
Issue Date
6-Aug-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd
Keywords
EGPA; EOM; Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; Eosinophilic otitis media; MEE; Middle ear effusion; Otologic
Citation
Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, v.18, no.1
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology
Volume
18
Number
1
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/100429
DOI
10.1186/s13223-022-00706-x
ISSN
1710-1484
Abstract
Background: Ear, nose, and throat involvement are common in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Among otologic manifestation, middle ear effusion (MEE) is less recognized but a problematic condition as it may progress to hearing impairment when left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics, risk factors and clinical outcomes of MEE in EGPA patients. Methods: This is a case–control study of patients who were diagnosed and treated for EGPA from January 1995 to November 2018. Patients with ear symptoms (ear fullness, ear discharge, tinnitus or hearing loss) were assessed by otologists and were included in the case group (n = 23) if clinically relevant. The other patients without MEE were included in the control group (n = 52). Risk of MEE was calculated using the Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: During median follow-up of 9.9 years, 23 (30.7%) out of 75 patients had MEE. In MEE group, 12 (52.2%) patients had hearing loss; conductive type in 10 (10/12, 83.3%) and mixed type in two (2/12, 16.7%). In multivariable regression analysis, major organ involvement at diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 65.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50—2838.39; P = 0.030] , early onset of ear symptom after systemic therapy (< 6 months) (aHR 40.0; 95% CI, 1.35—1183.43; P = 0.033) and continuing the maintenance steroid without cessation (aHR 8.59; 95% CI, 1.13—65.42; P = 0.038) were independently associated with a risk of MEE. To control MEE, 16 (69.6%) patients had to increase maintenance steroid dose and 9 (39.1%) patients experienced recurrent MEE whenever maintenance dose was tapered. Conclusions: MEE is a common but frequently neglected condition in EGPA which is often intractable. The maintenance steroid dose should be adequately adjusted to control MEE and to prevent from progressive hearing loss. Novel biologic agents possibly have a role in controlling MEE in EGPA. © 2022, The Author(s).
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher LEE, BYUNG JAE photo

LEE, BYUNG JAE
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE