Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Arthroscopic biceps augmentation does not improve clinical outcomes during incomplete repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears

Authors
Park, J.H.[Park, J.H.]Park, K.T.[Park, K.T.]Kim, S.C.[Kim, S.C.]Bukhary, H.A.[Bukhary, H.A.]Lee, S.M.[Lee, S.M.]Yoo, J.C.[Yoo, J.C.]
Issue Date
Nov-2022
Publisher
NLM (Medline)
Keywords
Arthroscopic biceps augmentation; augmentation; biceps; biceps tendon; clinical outcomes; Clinical outcomes; fatty infiltration; Footprint coverage; large to massive rotator cuff tears; MRI; re-tears; Retear rate; Rotator cuff tear; supraspinatus muscle; tendon
Citation
The bone & joint journal, v.104-B, no.11, pp.1234 - 1241
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
The bone & joint journal
Volume
104-B
Number
11
Start Page
1234
End Page
1241
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/101258
DOI
10.1302/0301-620X.104B11.BJJ-2022-0422.R2
ISSN
2049-4394
Abstract
AIMS: This study compared patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) with isolated incomplete repair of the tear and patients with incomplete repair with biceps tendon augmentation. We aimed to evaluate the additional benefit on clinical outcomes and the capacity to lower the re-tear rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,115 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for full-thickness tears between October 2011 and May 2019. From this series, we identified 77 patients (28 male, 49 female) with a mean age of 64.1 years (50 to 80). Patients were classified into groups A (n = 47 incomplete) and B (n = 30 with biceps augmentation) according to the nature of their reconstruction. Clinical scores were checked preoperatively and at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. In preoperative MRI, we measured the tear size, the degree of fatty infiltration, and muscle volume ratio of the supraspinatus. In postoperative MRI, the integrity of the repaired rotator cuff tendon was assessed using the Sugaya classification. Tendon thickness at the footprint was evaluated on T2-weighted oblique coronal view. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the initial preoperative demographic characteristics. In both groups, there were significant improvements in postoperative clinical scores (p < 0.001). However, most clinical outcomes, including range of motion measurements (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation, and abduction), showed no differences between the pre- and postoperative values. Comparing the postoperative outcomes of both groups, no further improvement from biceps augmentation was found. Group B, although not reaching statistical significance, had more re-tears than group A (30% vs 15%; p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: In LMRCTs, biceps augmentation provided no significant improvement of an incomplete repair. Therefore, biceps augmentation is not recommended in the treatment of LMRCTs.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1234-1241.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher YOO, JAE CHUL photo

YOO, JAE CHUL
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE