Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Authors
Loriot, YohannMatsubara, NobuakiPark, Se HoonHuddart, Robert A.Burgess, Earle F.Houede, NadineBanek, SeverineGuadalupi, ValentinaKu, Ja HyeonValderrama, Begona P.Tran, BenTriantos, SpyrosKean, YinAkapame, SydneyDeprince, KrisMukhopadhyay, SutapaStone, Nicole L.Siefker-Radtke, Arlene O.
Issue Date
21-Oct-2023
Publisher
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
Citation
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, v.389, no.21, pp 1961 - 1971
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume
389
Number
21
Start Page
1961
End Page
1971
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/109893
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2308849
ISSN
0028-4793
1533-4406
Abstract
Background Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear.Methods We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival.Results A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P=0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients).Conclusions Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, SE HOON photo

PARK, SE HOON
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE