Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 15 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG)

Authors
Park, HS[Park, H. S.]Kang, B[Kang, B.]Chon, HJ[Chon, H. J.]Im, HS[Im, H-S]Lee, CK[Lee, C-K]Kim, I[Kim, I]Kang, MJ[Kang, M. J.]Hwang, JE[Hwang, J. E.]Bae, WK[Bae, W. K.]Cheon, J[Cheon, J.]Park, JO[Park, J. O.]Hong, JY[Hong, J. Y.]Kang, JH[Kang, J. H.]Kim, JH[Kim, J. H.]Lim, SH[Lim, S. H.]Kim, JW[Kim, J. W.]Kim, JW[Kim, J-W]Yoo, C[Yoo, C.]Choi, HJ[Choi, H. J.]
Issue Date
Apr-2021
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
pancreatic cancer; second-line treatment; liposomal irinotecan; FOLFIRINOX
Citation
ESMO OPEN, v.6, no.2
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ESMO OPEN
Volume
6
Number
2
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/1251
DOI
10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100049
ISSN
2059-7029
Abstract
Background: There is no clear consensus on the recommended second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have disease progression following gemcitabine-based therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/ leucovorin (FL) and FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) in patients who had failed on the first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients and methods: From January 2015 to August 2019, 378 patients with MPC who had received nal-IRI/FL (n = 104) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) as second-line treatment across 11 institutions were included in this retrospective study. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups, except age and first-line regimens. With a median follow-up of 6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 4.6 months with FOLFIRINOX (P = 0.44). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months with nal-IRI/ FL versus 9.7 months with FOLFRINOX (P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two regimens in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The subgroup analysis revealed that younger age (<70 years) was associated with better OS with FOLFIRINOX. In contrast, older age (>= 70 years) was associated with better survival outcomes with nal-IRI/FL. Adverse events were manageable with both regimens; however, the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy was higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL. Conclusions: Second-line nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX showed similar effectiveness outcomes after progression following first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Age could be the determining factor for choosing the appropriate second-line therapy.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher HONG, JUNG YONG photo

HONG, JUNG YONG
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE