Detailed Information

Cited 29 time in webofscience Cited 37 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Testing a Reported Correlation between Arrival Directions of Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays and a Flux Pattern from nearby Starburst Galaxies using Telescope Array Data

Authors
Abbasi, RU[Abbasi, R. U.]Abe, M[Abe, M.]Abu-Zayyad, T[Abu-Zayyad, T.]Allen, M[Allen, M.]Azuma, R[Azuma, R.]Barcikowski, E[Barcikowski, E.]Belz, JW[Belz, J. W.]Bergman, DR[Bergman, D. R.]Blake, SA[Blake, S. A.]Cady, R[Cady, R.]Cheon, BG[Cheon, B. G.]Chiba, J[Chiba, J.]Chikawa, M[Chikawa, M.]di Matteo, A[di Matteo, A.]Fujii, T[Fujii, T.]Fujita, K[Fujita, K.]Fukushima, M[Fukushima, M.]Furlich, G[Furlich, G.]Goto, T[Goto, T.]Hanlon, W[Hanlon, W.]Hayashi, M[Hayashi, M.]Hayashi, Y[Hayashi, Y.]Hayashida, N[Hayashida, N.]Hibino, K[Hibino, K.]Honda, K[Honda, K.]Ikeda, D[Ikeda, D.]Inoue, N[Inoue, N.]Ishii, T[Ishii, T.]Ishimori, R[Ishimori, R.]Ito, H[Ito, H.]Ivanov, D[Ivanov, D.]Jeong, HM[Jeong, H. M.]Jeong, S[Jeong, S.]Jui, CCH[Jui, C. C. H.]Kadota, K[Kadota, K.]Kakimoto, F[Kakimoto, F.]Kalashev, O[Kalashev, O.]Kasahara, K[Kasahara, K.]Kawai, H[Kawai, H.]Kawakami, S[Kawakami, S.]Kawana, S[Kawana, S.]Kawata, K[Kawata, K.]Kido, E[Kido, E.]Kim, HB[Kim, H. B.]Kim, JH[Kim, J. H.]Kishigami, S[Kishigami, S.]Kitamura, S[Kitamura, S.]Kitamura, Y[Kitamura, Y.]Kuzmin, V[Kuzmin, V]Kuznetsov, M[Kuznetsov, M.]Kwon, YJ[Kwon, Y. J.]Lee, KH[Lee, K. H.]Lubsandorzhiev, B[Lubsandorzhiev, B.]Lundquist, JP[Lundquist, J. P.]Machida, K[Machida, K.]Martens, K[Martens, K.]Matsuyama, T[Matsuyama, T.]Matthews, JN[Matthews, J. N.]Mayta, R[Mayta, R.]Minamino, M[Minamino, M.]Mukai, K[Mukai, K.]Myers, I[Myers, I]Nagasawa, K[Nagasawa, K.]Nagataki, S[Nagataki, S.]Nakamura, R[Nakamura, R.]Nakamura, T[Nakamura, T.]Nonaka, T[Nonaka, T.]Oda, H[Oda, H.]Ogio, S[Ogio, S.]Ogura, J[Ogura, J.]Ohnishi, M[Ohnishi, M.]Ohoka, H[Ohoka, H.]Okuda, T[Okuda, T.]Omura, Y[Omura, Y.]Ono, M[Ono, M.]Onogi, R[Onogi, R.]Oshima, A[Oshima, A.]Ozawa, S[Ozawa, S.]Park, IH[Park, I. H.]Pshirkov, MS[Pshirkov, M. S.]Remington, J[Remington, J.]Rodriguez, DC[Rodriguez, D. C.]Rubtsov, G[Rubtsov, G.]Ryu, D[Ryu, D.]Sagawa, H[Sagawa, H.]Sahara, R[Sahara, R.]Saito, K[Saito, K.]Saito, Y[Saito, Y.]Sakaki, N[Sakaki, N.]Sakurai, N[Sakurai, N.]Scott, LM[Scott, L. M.]Seki, T[Seki, T.]Sekino, K[Sekino, K.]Shah, PD[Shah, P. D.]Shibata, F[Shibata, F.]Shibata, T[Shibata, T.]Shimodaira, H[Shimodaira, H.]Shin, BK[Shin, B. K.]Shin, HS[Shin, H. S.]Smith, JD[Smith, J. D.]Sokolsky, P[Sokolsky, P.]Stokes, BT[Stokes, B. T.]Stratton, SR[Stratton, S. R.]Stroman, TA[Stroman, T. A.]Suzawa, T[Suzawa, T.]Takagi, Y[Takagi, Y.]Takahashi, Y[Takahashi, Y.]Takamura, M[Takamura, M.]Takeda, M[Takeda, M.]Takeishi, R[Takeishi, R.]Taketa, A[Taketa, A.]Takita, M[Takita, M.]Tameda, Y[Tameda, Y.]Tanaka, H[Tanaka, H.]Tanaka, K[Tanaka, K.]Tanaka, M[Tanaka, M.]Thomas, SB[Thomas, S. B.]Thomson, GB[Thomson, G. B.]Tinyakov, P[Tinyakov, P.]Tkachev, I[Tkachev, I]Tokuno, H[Tokuno, H.]Tomida, T[Tomida, T.]Troitsky, S[Troitsky, S.]Tsunesada, Y[Tsunesada, Y.]Tsutsumi, K[Tsutsumi, K.]Uchihori, Y[Uchihori, Y.]Udo, S[Udo, S.]Urban, F[Urban, F.]Wong, T[Wong, T.]Yamamoto, M[Yamamoto, M.]Yamane, R[Yamane, R.]Yamaoka, H[Yamaoka, H.]Yamazaki, K[Yamazaki, K.]Yang, J[Yang, J.]Yashiro, K[Yashiro, K.]Yoneda, Y[Yoneda, Y.]Yoshida, S[Yoshida, S.]Yoshii, H[Yoshii, H.]Zhezher, Y[Zhezher, Y.]Zundel, Z[Zundel, Z.]
Issue Date
10-Nov-2018
Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
Keywords
astroparticle physics; cosmic rays; galaxies: starburst; methods: data analysis
Citation
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, v.867, no.2
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume
867
Number
2
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/16792
DOI
10.3847/2041-8213/aaebf9
ISSN
2041-8205
Abstract
The Pierre Auger Collaboration (Auger) recently reported a correlation between the arrival directions of cosmic rays with energies above 39 EeV and the flux pattern of 23 nearby starburst galaxies (SBGs). In this Letter, we tested the same hypothesis using cosmic rays detected by the Telescope Array experiment (TA) in the 9 yr period from 2008 May to 2017 May. Unlike the Auger analysis, we did not optimize the parameter values but kept them fixed to the best-fit values found by Auger, namely 9.7% for the anisotropic fraction of cosmic rays assumed to originate from the SBGs in the list and 12 degrees.9 for the angular scale of the correlations. The energy threshold that we adopted is 43 EeV, corresponding to 39 EeV in Auger when taking into account the energy-scale difference between two experiments. We find that the TA data is compatible with isotropy to within 1.1 sigma and with the Auger result to within 1.4 sigma, meaning that it is not capable to discriminate between these two hypotheses.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE