Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 17 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Impact of clinically evident portal hypertension on clinical outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolization

Authors
Kim, NH[Kim, Nam Hee]Lee, T[Lee, Taeheon]Cho, YK[Cho, Yong Kyun]Kim, BI[Kim, Byung Ik]Kim, HJ[Kim, Hong Joo]
Issue Date
Jul-2018
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
clinically evident portal hypertension; complete response; hepatocellular carcinoma; overall survival; progression-free survival; transarterial chemoembolization
Citation
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, v.33, no.7, pp.1397 - 1406
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume
33
Number
7
Start Page
1397
End Page
1406
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/19558
DOI
10.1111/jgh.14083
ISSN
0815-9319
Abstract
Background and AimThe aim of this study is to determine the impact of clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MethodsA retrospective data analysis was performed for a total of 388 treatment-naive HCC patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who underwent TACE as first-line treatment from January 2000 to June 2014. Cumulative occurrence rate of complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with CEPH and those without CEPH (esophageal/gastric varices or low platelet count [<100000 per mm(3)] associated with splenomegaly). ResultsAmong 388 patients, 252 (64.9%) had CEPH, while 136 (35.1%) had no evidence of CEPH at the time of HCC diagnosis. Cumulative probability of the occurrence of CR was significantly lower in patients with CEPH than that in patients without CEPH (P<0.001). Median PFS was significantly shorter in patients with CEPH than that in patients without CEPH (5 vs 31months, P<0.001). Five-year OS rate was significantly lower in patients with CEPH than that in patients without CEPH (41.5% vs 77.5%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of CEPH was the most powerful poor prognostic factor for the occurrence of CR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.28; P<0.001), PFS (aHR, 5.01; 95% CI, 3.08-8.12; P<0.001), and OS (aHR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.66-5.23; P<0.001). ConclusionsThe presence of CEPH should be considered as a major negative prognostic factor for patients with HCC who will undergo TACE.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, HONG JOO photo

KIM, HONG JOO
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE