Detailed Information

Cited 133 time in webofscience Cited 140 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trialopen access

Authors
Gross-Goupil, M.[Gross-Goupil, M.]Kwon, T.G.[Kwon, T.G.]Eto, M.[Eto, M.]Ye, D.[Ye, D.]Miyake, H.[Miyake, H.]Seo, S.I.[Seo, S.I.]Byun, S.-S.[Byun, S.-S.]Lee, J.L.[Lee, J.L.]Master, V.[Master, V.]Jin, J.[Jin, J.]DeBenedetto, R.[DeBenedetto, R.]Linke, R.[Linke, R.]Casey, M.[Casey, M.]Rosbrook, B.[Rosbrook, B.]Lechuga, M.[Lechuga, M.]Valota, O.[Valota, O.]Grande, E.[Grande, E.]Quinn, D.I.[Quinn, D.I.]
Issue Date
Dec-2018
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Keywords
adjuvant; axitinib; disease-free survival; overall survival; renal cell carcinoma; safety
Citation
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, v.29, no.12, pp.2371 - 2378
Journal Title
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
Volume
29
Number
12
Start Page
2371
End Page
2378
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/23679
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdy454
ISSN
0923-7534
Abstract
Background: The ATLAS trial compared axitinib versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Patients and methods: In a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, patients had >50% clear-cell RCC, had undergone nephrectomy, and had no evidence of macroscopic residual or metastatic disease [independent review committee (IRC) confirmed]. The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients [≥pT2 and/or N+, any Fuhrman grade (FG), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0/1]. Patients (stratified by risk group/country) received (1 : 1) oral twice-daily axitinib 5 mg or placebo for ≤3 years, with a 1-year minimum unless recurrence, occurrence of second primary malignancy, significant toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) per IRC. A prespecified DFS analysis in the highest-risk subpopulation (pT3, FG ≥ 3 or pT4 and/or N+, any T, any FG) was conducted. Results: A total of 724 patients (363 versus 361, axitinib versus placebo) were randomized from 8 May 2012, to 1 July 2016. The trial was stopped due to futility at a preplanned interim analysis at 203 DFS events. There was no significant difference in DFS per IRC [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.870; 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.660-1.147; P = 0.3211). In the highest-risk subpopulation, a 36% and 27% reduction in risk of a DFS event (HR; 95% CI) was observed per investigator (0.641; 0.468-0.879; P = 0.0051), and by IRC (0.735; 0.525-1.028; P = 0.0704), respectively. Overall survival data were not mature. Similar adverse events (AEs; 99% versus 92%) and serious AEs (19% versus 14%), but more grade 3/4 AEs (61% versus 30%) were reported for axitinib versus placebo. Conclusions: ATLAS did not meet its primary end point; however, improvement in DFS per investigator was seen in the highest-risk subpopulation. No new safety signals were reported. Trial registration number: NCT01599754.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher SEO, SEONG IL photo

SEO, SEONG IL
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE