Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 7 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical relevance of functionally insignificant moderate coronary artery stenosis assessed by 3-vessel fractional flow reserve measurementopen access

Authors
Park, J.[Park, J.]Lee, J.M.[Lee, J.M.]Koo, B.-K.[Koo, B.-K.]Shin, E.-S.[Shin, E.-S.]Nam, C.-W.[Nam, C.-W.]Doh, J.-H.[Doh, J.-H.]Hwang, D.[Hwang, D.]Zhang, J.[Zhang, J.]Hu, X.[Hu, X.]Wang, J.A.[Wang, J.A.]Ye, F.[Ye, F.]Chen, S.[Chen, S.]Yang, J.[Yang, J.]Chen, J.[Chen, J.]Tanaka, N.[Tanaka, N.]Yokoi, H.[Yokoi, H.]Matsuo, H.[Matsuo, H.]Takashima, H.[Takashima, H.]Shiono, Y.[Shiono, Y.]Akasaka, T.[Akasaka, T.]
Issue Date
Feb-2018
Publisher
American Heart Association Inc.
Keywords
coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; multivessel coronary artery disease; physiology; function; prognosis
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association, v.7, no.4
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of the American Heart Association
Volume
7
Number
4
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/24827
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.117.008055
ISSN
2047-9980
Abstract
Background--Understanding of the risk conferred by functionally insignificant lesions in multiple coronary vessels is limited. We investigated the prognostic implications of coronary artery disease (CAD) based on 3-vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods and Results--A total of 1,136 patients underwent FFR measurement in the 3 major epicardial arteries. We defined vessels with Moderate CAD as vessels with FFR, 0.81 to 0.87. Patients were classified into Group 1: No apparent CAD (FFR > 0.87 in all 3-vessels); Group 2: Single-vessel moderate CAD; Group 3: Multivessel moderate CAD; and Group 4: Functionally significant CAD (FFR=0.80) in any vessel. The primary end point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. Forty-three percent of patients had moderate CAD (Group 2: 403/1136, 35.5%; Group 3: 84/1136, 7.4%). The 2-year risk of major adverse cardiac events was not significantly different between patients with singlevessel moderate CAD and no apparent CAD (2.6 versus 2.6%; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.4%-2.8%; P=0.89). However, patients with multivessel moderate CAD were at significantly higher risk than Group 1 (7.4 versus 2.6%; hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1%-9.8%; P=0.03). The risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with multivessel moderate CAD was comparable to that of patients with functionally significant CAD (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-3.0%; P=0.67). In a multivariable regression model, multivessel moderate CAD was an independent predictor of greater risk of 2-year major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions--Global physiologic assessment with FFR measurement of 3 vessels can identify multivessel moderate CAD. The prognostic implication of multivessel moderate CAD appears comparable to that of functionally significant CAD. Clinical Trial Registration--URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01621438. © 2018 The Authors.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher LEE, JOO MYUNG photo

LEE, JOO MYUNG
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE