Detailed Information

Cited 115 time in webofscience Cited 117 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The ORCHARRD Study

Authors
Van Imhoff, G.W.[Van Imhoff, G.W.]McMillan, A.[ McMillan, A.]Matasar, M.J.[ Matasar, M.J.]Radford, J.[ Radford, J.]Ardeshna, K.M.[ Ardeshna, K.M.]Kuliczkowski, K.[ Kuliczkowski, K.]Kim, W.[Kim, W.]Hong, X.[ Hong, X.]Goerloev, J.S.[ Goerloev, J.S.]Davies, A.[ Davies, A.]Barrigón, M.D.C.[ Barrigón, M.D.C.]Ogura, M.[ Ogura, M.]Leppä, S.[ Leppä, S.]Fennessy, M.[ Fennessy, M.]Liao, Q.[ Liao, Q.]Van Der Holt, B.[ Van Der Holt, B.]Lisby, S.[ Lisby, S.]Hagenbeek, A.[ Hagenbeek, A.]
Issue Date
10-Feb-2017
Publisher
AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.35, no.5, pp.544 - +
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume
35
Number
5
Start Page
544
End Page
+
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/30088
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.0198
ISSN
0732-183X
Abstract
Purpose We compared the efficacy of ofatumumab (O) versus rituximab (R) in combination with cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone (DHAP) salvage treatment, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods Patients with CD201 DLBCL age >= 18 years who had experienced their first relapse or who were refractory to first-line R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)-like treatment were randomly assigned between three cycles of R-DHAP or O-DHAP. Either O 1,000 mg or R 375 mg/m2 was administered for a total of four infusions (days 1 and 8 of cycle 1; day 1 of cycles 2 and 3 of DHAP). Patients who experienced a response after two cycles of treatment received the third cycle, followed by high-dose therapy and ASCT. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with failure to achieve a response after cycle 2 included as an event. Results Between March 2010 and December 2013, 447 patients were randomly assigned. Median age was 57 years (range, 18 to 83 years); 17% were age >= 65 years; 63% had stage III and IV disease; 71% did not achieve complete response (CR) or experience response for, 1 year on first-line R-CHOP. Response rate for O-DHAP was 38% (CR, 15%) versus 42% (CR, 22%) for R-DHAP. ASCT on protocol was completed by 74 patients (33%) in the O arm and 83 patients (37%) in the R arm. PFS, event-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between O-DHAP versus R-DHAP: PFS at 2 years was 24% versus 26% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.42; P = .33); event-free survival at 2 years was 16% versus 18% (HR, 1.10; P=.35); and overall survival at 2 years was 41% versus 38% (HR, 0.90; P=.38). Positron emission tomography negativity before ASCT was highly predictive for superior outcome. Conclusion No difference in efficacy was found between O-DHAP and R-DHAP as salvage treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, WON SEOG photo

KIM, WON SEOG
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE