Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Does illiquidity matter in residential properties?

Authors
Hwang, S.[Hwang, S.]Cho, Y.[ Cho, Y.]Shin, J.[Shin, J.]
Issue Date
2017
Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Keywords
Illiquidity costs; residential properties; flight to quality; flight to liquidity; R31; G12
Citation
APPLIED ECONOMICS, v.49, no.1, pp.1 - 20
Indexed
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
APPLIED ECONOMICS
Volume
49
Number
1
Start Page
1
End Page
20
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/33818
DOI
10.1080/00036846.2016.1189506
ISSN
0003-6846
Abstract
No, it does not, despite the general perception that illiquidity matters in real estate. As expected, our evidence shows that the illiquidity costs for the U.S. residential properties are large. The costs are equivalent to 12% of the total property returns on average, ranging from 9.5% to 29.5% of property prices depending on the illiquidity level and market conditions. However, when amortized by holding periods, monthly illiquidity costs are on average 0.08%, and illiquidity risk does not appear to be priced in residential properties; illiquid properties do not show higher returns than liquid properties. On the contrary, we find evidence of flight-to-quality in bull markets, that is, high-quality illiquid properties are preferred to low-quality liquid properties in buoyant markets. These results are in sharp contrast with those in equities and bonds where flight-to-liquidity has been reported when markets are in stress.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Economics > Department of Economics > 1. Journal Articles
Economics > Global Economics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher HWANG, SOO SUNG photo

HWANG, SOO SUNG
Economics (Global Economics)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE