Detailed Information

Cited 25 time in webofscience Cited 27 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Survival Analysis of Single Large (> 5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: BCLC A versus Bopen access

Authors
Cho, Y.[Cho, Y.]Sinn, D.H.[Sinn, D.H.]Yu, S.J.[Yu, S.J.]Gwak, G.Y.[Gwak, G.Y.]Kim, J.H.[ Kim, J.H.]Yoo, Y.J.[ Yoo, Y.J.]Jun, D.W.[ Jun, D.W.]Kim, T.Y.[ Kim, T.Y.]Lee, H.Y.[ Lee, H.Y.]Cho, E.J.[ Cho, E.J.]Lee, J.-H.[ Lee, J.-H.]Kim, Y.J.[ Kim, Y.J.]Yoon, J.-H.[ Yoon, J.-H.]
Issue Date
15-Nov-2016
Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Citation
PLOS ONE, v.11, no.11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
PLOS ONE
Volume
11
Number
11
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/34356
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0165722
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Background & Aims Single large (>5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is classified as Barcelona Liver Clinic (BCLC) stage early stage (A). Yet, controversies exist whether single large HCC can be considered as early stage. We have analyzed long-term outcome to see which stage is appropriate for these patients. Methods From 2005 to 2006, 1,546 consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed as HCC (BCLC A or B) at four tertiary hospitals in Korea were analyzed. BCLC A was sub-classified into A1 (single 2-5 cm), A2 (2-3 nodules <= 3 cm), and A3 (single >5 cm). BCLC B1 included patients beyond-Milan criteria, and within up-to-7 criterion. Survival prediction between subgroupings (1: A1 + A2 + A3 vs. B1 and 2: A1 + A2 vs. A3 + B1) was compared based on c-index and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 62.3, 58.6, 36.8, and 42.0% for A1, A2, A3 and B1, respectively. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, OS was significantly different between A3 + B1 vs. A1 + A2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; P < 0.001), but not between A1 + A2 + A3 vs. B1 (HR 1.19; P = 0.258). For A3, surgical resection showed superior OS over transarterial chemoembolization. Survival prediction was superior in subgrouping 2 (AIC 5727.2; cindex 0.652) than subgrouping 1 (AIC 5766.3; c-index 0.619) even after inverse probability weighting. Conclusions This large scale long-term follow-up data shows that single large tumor should be considered as intermediate stage in terms of prognosis. However, in terms of treatment, resection might be the first line treatment option.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher GWAK, GEUM YOUN photo

GWAK, GEUM YOUN
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE